HogansHero said: "Sorry but I don't play that way. If you have facts spill em or be quiet. What you are offering is conjecture (much of which is known to be false and, when confronted, you waffle on) and not facts. If you care to tether some statement to some fact (e.g., "I heard x is upset about y"
then we can see if that holds up. But you have to understand that in negotiation everyone stakes out a value, and by definition those values do not usually equate. And when they are too far apart, common ground is not found. But these things are rarely personal, and even the most vocal proponent of his own value (by which I mean LOJ) has enthusiastically stated that he looks forward to coming back to Hamilton "at any time and any place." That doesn't sound like the utterances of some backstage brawler."
I don't give a damn how you play. I'm sure friends who have left the show don't want me writing the reasons why, and those still with it don't want gossip on a public forum. And I'm intimately familiar with how negotiations work, thank you, I never once suggested that either party takes things personally. What "conjecture" have I A) been confronted with or B) waffled on or C) is known to be false?
If you'll recall, I started with:
"I'm sure Diggs had every intention of staying much longer and continued to do the show in good faith before striking a deal, but negotiations must have just broken down and so now he leaves.
It's business. His star is rising, he can do TV, film, music, for a lot more than what they'd pay him to stay in Hamilton."
Do you take issue with any of that?
Updated On: 7/13/16 at 04:56 PM