I don't know why anyone would think SINGIN' IN THE RAIN would do better than AN AMERICAN IN PARIS or DAMES AT SEA.
An American In Paris was a critical darling and is making a million dollars a week on broadway, so this production turning out like that would be good for it.
I don't think this production will be all that successful though.
Playbill's article on this starts with a sentence that I think is in startlingly poor taste: "New York will get a chance to express its solidarity with the French people in person next year when the Théâtre du Châtelet sends its revival of Singin' the Rain to Broadway."
I saw the 1980s production at the Gershwin and as stated, enjoyable would be the operative word. Not memorable by any means but a lot of it was fun. The best things about were the sets, costumes and Don Correia. A great dancer and a man of much charm. I saw him in Rain, as a replacement in the original Chorus Line and the first Follies revival. He has been married to Sandy Duncan for many years.
Overall, though, the production just didn't jell, which I would attribute to director/choreographer Twyla Tharp, who I think was a bit out of her element. Nothing was wrong; just not enough was really right. And the Gershwin is such a horrible, cavernous space.
Maybe not re-imagining the role on Broadway, but perhaps as a replacement sometime down the line
The thing is, besides being an utter toad of a human being, Riedel usually has the least knowledge of the topic in the room. He doesn't usually understand the content or approach of a show, and is always completely and unfailingly socially ignorant, which makes it really infuriating when Susan can't get a word in edgewise. A definitive mansplainer; it's always painful when he has female guests. I watch the show sporadically when I really want to see a guest, because it's the only theatre talkshow we have, but it would be so much better without this hateful clown in a dadcoat. (thanks ScaryWarhol)
adamgreer said: "Tony Yazbeck, or is that too obvious a choice?"
Obvious or not, I would fly to New York for the weekend just to see this show if he were cast. I loved him in OTT. He's such a natural. And the classics fit his persona, even by his own admission. I can almost hear him singing the title song right now.
I thought Fairchild was good in AAIP, but Yazbeck was near perfection in OTT, IMO.
Amazing2 said: "Chris Colfer is a horrible dancer. I can't think of anyone less appropriate for that role. Why not Aaron Tveit?
"
Aaron Tveit is more of a singer. I don't think he would want to do such a dance heavy role.
The thing is, besides being an utter toad of a human being, Riedel usually has the least knowledge of the topic in the room. He doesn't usually understand the content or approach of a show, and is always completely and unfailingly socially ignorant, which makes it really infuriating when Susan can't get a word in edgewise. A definitive mansplainer; it's always painful when he has female guests. I watch the show sporadically when I really want to see a guest, because it's the only theatre talkshow we have, but it would be so much better without this hateful clown in a dadcoat. (thanks ScaryWarhol)
I kind of hate to admit this, but I'd like to see a revival of this, although I do question its viability. I'm also in the camp that has no interest in seeing Chris Colfer on Broadway.
Matthew Morrison? He's already working for Weinstein and he covered songs like Singin in the Rain, Make em laugh, cheek to cheek and You are all the world to me on Glee.
I really like that Matthew Morrison suggestion! He's also a dancer. Aaron could really sing it, but I don't remember if he dances. I'd like to see Aaron in Miss Saigon. Sorry--off-topic.
Gavin Lee would be fantastic. He did Top Hat with Kristen Beth Williams in London (at the same time as Singing was running there, incidentally), and he definitely has both the charms and the dance chops for the show