Miles2Go2 said: "After seeing an interview with Rex Reed last Sunday morning on CBS, I can’t help thinking that Rex Reed is to movies what Reidel is to theater. Opinionated. Not particularly well informed. Viscous except when he decides to be an unequivocal cheerleader with very little middle ground. Thoughts?"
Rex Reed always had the vitriolic edge, but he was a highly respected writer for quite a while. He regularly wrote lengthy, highly analytical pieces for the Sunday NY Times. He was always biased towards and against certain directors, e.g., loved John Schlesinger no matter how bad the movie was (Schlesinger had some great movies and some real messes); hated everything Robert Altman did, including some real movie masterpieces; however, his writing was extremely polished, a lot of his analysis very interesting.
As he got older, his tastes grew more conservative, for want of a better word; but, even today, if you read a review of a movie that he liked or thought was a near-miss, it is extremely well-written and factually correct, unlike Reidel. When he doesn't like something, he is as bitchy as anyone I have ever read.
To this day, when I read reviews of certain movies, I will look up RR just to see where he came down on it. Frequently disagree, but -- knowing his biases -- I get further perspective every time.