Ke3 said: "
I just missed seeing this a few years ago but the blurb raises a question I've had about it for a while, what schools are teaching John Proctor as a hero?"
The playwright discusses this in an interview on Studio Theatre's website:
ALH: Do you want to say anything about The Crucible? The space it holds in English classes or the American Theatre?
KB: I mean, I always make sure to say that I don’t think The Crucible is a bad play. Arthur Miller is a really ****ing great writer. The play is less about me being “down with The Crucible” and more about being interested in the way that The Crucible is being simplified and then passed on—because that’s what the lesson plans are and that’s what the curriculum is. #MeToo pushed people to really look at which systems we’re handing down, systems that we get trapped in and don’t know how to imagine things outside of—The Crucible seems emblematic of that to me.
Also, I love Abigail. She’s painted as such an easy villain, but—and I’m just quoting my own play at this point—but she literally says, “I saw my parents’ heads get split open on the pillow next to me.” All the John Proctor stuff is outside of that. This is a woman, a young woman, who’s deeply traumatized, wounded in so many ways, living with cousins, and just got fired from her job. I just really love her, and all the young women in that play.
I got mad on their behalf that they’re not the ones who get analyzed more. And I think that there are flaws in the writing around how John Proctor is portrayed—he’s the hero, he’s the “beacon of integrity,” as people say in the play. But that’s really a question of is how the play is taught more than how it’s directed. I think you can produce The Crucible in a way that makes clear what is going on here.
https://www.studiotheatre.org/plays/play-detail/2021-2022-john-proctor-is-the-villain/john-proctor-origins