For those always complaining/joking that Jamie Lloyd productions are all black with no sets or costumes, here is a pic of the curtain call for Tempest.
I’ve been looking for this thread lol! Saw Tempest on Monday and I can say that Jamie Lloyd should just stop doing Shakespeare! Plain and simple! Weaver was ok but I think she was miscast. If there is any star studded performance it’s Mason Alexander Park as Ariel! Truly iconic!
As for the production, the pacing of it was so slow that if they picked it up, they could’ve shaved at least 40 minutes from the runtime. So many of these scenes felt too prolonged and needed to be trimmed down. Also, I’m glad Jamie Lloyd put a little bit of structure in the staging, but to be honest, the set is literally Waiting for Godot just without the tree. I’m hoping changes are being made at lightning speed before the press opening, but if not, I really wouldn’t recommend this unless you really want to be bored out of your mind. Let’s hope Much Ado is better. Probably the highlight of the night was meeting and chatting with Joe Locke and Tobie Donavan from Heartstopper who were in the row ahead of us. Lovely individuals!
The idea is to work and to experiment. Some things will be creatively successful, some things will succeed at the box office, and some things will only - which is the biggest only - teach you things that see the future. And they're probably as valuable as any of your successes. -Harold Prince
FANtomFollies said: "For those always complaining/joking that Jamie Lloyd productions are all black with no sets or costumes, here is a pic of the curtain call for Tempest."
I mean... it's still extremely minimal with a very limited (nearly monochrome) and cold color palette. Not exactly a huge stretch and still very recognizably a Lloyd production.
"...everyone finally shut up, and the audience could enjoy the beginning of the Anatevka Pogram in peace."
Dylan Smith4 said: "I’ve been looking for this thread lol! Saw Tempest on Monday and I can say that Jamie Lloyd should just stop doing Shakespeare! Plain and simple! Weaver was ok but I think she was miscast. If there is any star studded performance it’s Mason Alexander Park as Ariel! Truly iconic!
T As for the production, the pacing of it was so slow that if they picked it up, they could’ve shaved at least 40 minutes from the runtime. So many of these scenes felt too prolonged and needed to be trimmed down. Also, I’m glad Jamie Lloyd put a little bit of structure in the staging, but to be honest, the set is literally Waiting for Godot just without the tree. I’m hoping changes are being made at lightning speed before the press opening, but if not, I really wouldn’t recommend this unless you really want to be bored out of your mind. Let’s hope Much Ado is better. Probably the highlight of the night was meeting and chatting with Joe Locke and Tobie Donavan from Heartstopper who were in the row ahead of us. Lovely individuals!"
Thanks for this. I love this play and was considering planning a trip around this. Going to stick with my memories of Plummer doing this in Stratford. Hopefully his Much Ado will be a better casting fit.
Play Esq. said: "Thanks for this. I love this play and wasconsidering planning a trip around this. Going to stick with my memories of Plummer doing this in Stratford. Hopefully, his Much Ado will be a better casting fit."
You're welcome! Yeah, it really was not that good, and I just don't think Sigourney Weaver is as big a name here as she is in the States. So many empty seats the night I went. I wish the entire cast the very best as it is a very limited run. Hope Much Ado is somewhat better. I would try to see Producers if you can. I was lucky to snag a rush ticket last night and wow was it incredible!
The idea is to work and to experiment. Some things will be creatively successful, some things will succeed at the box office, and some things will only - which is the biggest only - teach you things that see the future. And they're probably as valuable as any of your successes. -Harold Prince
Unless he can make up with it for "much ado about nothing" I wonder if this will be the end of the line for Jamie Lloyd doing Shakespeare with celebrities. After the Tom Holland R&J reviews and the upcoming bloodbath that is likely to be "The Tempest" would any celebrity want to take this risk again?
"You can't overrate Bernadette Peters. She is such a genius. There's a moment in "Too Many Mornings" and Bernadette doing 'I wore green the last time' - It's a voice that is just already given up - it is so sorrowful. Tragic. You can see from that moment the show is going to be headed into such dark territory and it hinges on this tiny throwaway moment of the voice." - Ben Brantley (2022)
"Bernadette's whole, stunning performance [as Rose in Gypsy] galvanized the actors capable of letting loose with her. Bernadette's Rose did take its rightful place, but too late, and unseen by too many who should have seen it" Arthur Laurents (2009)
"Sondheim's own favorite star performances? [Bernadette] Peters in ''Sunday in the Park,'' Lansbury in ''Sweeney Todd'' and ''obviously, Ethel was thrilling in 'Gypsy.'' Nytimes, 2000
binau said: "Unless he can make up with it for "much ado about nothing" I wonder if this will be the end of the line for Jamie Lloyd doing Shakespeare with celebrities. After the Tom Holland R&J reviews and the upcoming bloodbath that is likely to be "The Tempest" would any celebrity want to take this risk again?"
He needs to stop working with Shakespeare. This whole season at Drury Lane was basically ALW proving to the late John Gielgud that Shakespeare can be back at that venue again. It’s funny as this season is only two plays and then go right back to musicals with Hercules.
The idea is to work and to experiment. Some things will be creatively successful, some things will succeed at the box office, and some things will only - which is the biggest only - teach you things that see the future. And they're probably as valuable as any of your successes. -Harold Prince
Whew. Just reading reviews for The Tempest and while Sigourney Weaver gets some praise in a couple, she comes in for quite a bit of criticism in most, some of it quite biting. A few examples:
"There’s no staff for this self-made wizard to wield, though much woodenness in her delivery."
“The Tempest: Shakespeare’s language seems alien to Sigourney Weaver
Making her West End debut as Prospero, the much-loved film star sadly fails to weave the requisite magic”
“The household robot Alexa could have breathed more life into the lines”
I had really wanted to see this just for Sigourney but opted for something else tonight because life is just too short to sit through more of Lloyd's same old...nothingness - even for her.
I love me some Sigourney Weaver, but she always plays herself in everything if you know what I mean. Her best performance is in the Snow White movie she did for HBO in the 90s
WldKingdomHM said: "I love me someSigourney Weaver, but she always plays herself in everything if you know what I mean. Her best performance is in the Snow White movie she did for HBO in the 90s"
WldKingdomHM said: "I love me someSigourney Weaver, but she always plays herself in everything if you know what I mean. Her best performance is in the Snow White movie she did for HBO in the 90s"
I am so weary with the "They always play themselves" comment about any actor. It's such a consumerist way of looking at acting.
verywellthensigh said: "WldKingdomHM said: "I love me someSigourney Weaver, but she always plays herself in everything if you know what I mean. Her best performance is in the Snow White movie she did for HBO in the 90s"
I am so weary with the "They always play themselves" comment about any actor. It's such a consumerist way of looking at acting."
I think there's grey areas here. I like to play a game called "actor or movie star" that is a kind of oversimplified version of this trope, because it's a truth: some actors (Meryl Streep, Daniel Day Lewis, Viola Davis, Peter Sellars) are chameleons. They build a character from the ground up and they disappear into the role. And some actors have strong screen personas (Jimmy Stewart, Tina Fey, Denzel Washington, Steve Martin) that their roles form around - they tend to ground the character in their own experience. That is not to say they don't emote well on screen, or act well, but it's a different method of performing. Are you creating a different person, or are you reacting as you would if you were in this situation? I haven't seen enough of Sigourney Weaver's career to judge whether she can "transform into the character" or not, but she strikes me more as the later.
I am really curious to see how Jamie Lloyd will do "Much Ado" which is my favorite Shakespeare play. It is so joyful. Has Jamie Lloyd ever done anything that was "joyful" . Having seen his "Seagull", "Evita", Cyrano" "Dolls House"and "Sunset" I don't see it as a good fit.. Quite frankly, while I loved "Sunset" and "Evita" the others were so depressing.
George in DC said: "I am really curious to see how Jamie Lloyd will do "Much Ado" which is my favorite Shakespeare play. It is so joyful. Has Jamie Lloyd ever done anything that was "joyful" . Having seen his "Seagull", "Evita", Cyrano" "Dolls House"and "Sunset" I don't see it as a good fit.. Quite frankly, while I loved "Sunset" and "Evita" the others were so depressing."