The Tom split has been tried before, as has the considerably older Tom, placing a late middle-aged actor in the scenes of his youth to re-enact his past. The play is, to be obvious, fragile. Too much conceptual interpolation weighs upon that fragility and calls undue attention to direction (characters slipping through backs of sofas, okay, but we notice). I can accept a degree of stylization -- it's a memory play, and memory is unreliable and dependent upon imagination to compensate at times -- but the text should be front and center. The two Toms, oddly enough, calls attention to theatrical conceit in ham-fisted ways. It's a film idea -- edits doing the heavy lifting -- grafted on a play that works handily trusting the audience to accept a time difference between the narration and action recalled. And the narration, beautifully written, doesn't sustain a full performance, as is noted here. But I'd kill to see this. Thank you for the really clear report. I can imagine strengths and liabilities.
"I'm a comedian, but in my spare time, things bother me." Garry Shandling
Updated On: 5/26/22 at 10:10 PM