Variety is positive: "This original musical has laughs, tears and joy — not to mention jaw-dropping star-turns — in a clash-of-cultures hoot that earns a big Broadway corsage."
And I really think the “mixed” ones are still far more positive than negative. Show was never designed to win a Pulitzer. Does exactly what it sets out to do. I’ll call any review that has criticisms but ends with the main takeaway how much fun they had and how much they enjoyed it as a win! Very happy for them!
Side note... has the Times always linked out to bootleg footage?? I almost never click on the hyperlinks in reviews, but was curious about the “she had but one showstopper,” and wanted to see As We Stumble Along again... but was so surprised to see that it linked to a bootleg on YouTube. I mean, I have zero problem with that since this is the world we live in now, and it’s nice to be able to see great performances however we can see them, but it still surprises me a little.
VotePeron said: "Man, when the New York Times writes against popular opinion, we crucify them on here spouting about how much they don’t matter anymore.
Guess, uh, we’re having a change of heart on that tonight?
DISASTER got a Critics Pick from Jesse, too, y’all."
Isherwood gave Disaster it’s Critics’ pic.
I’d wager a guess that people are thrilled because a show that has the odds against it (it’s original, no star casting, etc.) got a review that may help it stick around a bit longer for more people to experience.
I have not been crazy about green as a NYT's critic. I did, however, enjoy him on Tbeater Talk.
I think he nailed this review though. And glad to know that the words "Golden Age" went through his mind also. They sure went through mine several times while seeing the show.
Just because I've seen no one talk about it, how much life do ya'll think this show will get regionally and at high schools?
Given it's technical simplicity and tendancy to stick to the more "traditional Broadway musical cliche," I could see this being very popular post-Broadway, and being a very simple production to throw together. I'd love to see the show get a national tour, and I think given it's subject material, it would be really nice to spread it's message outside of New York and across the country eventually. I'd love to think they could use that to market the hell out of it, but Broadway's marketing has been pretty bleh already.
Haven't seen the show, so my comments are only based on the basic premise.
Schools that will take this on are likely the ones that dont NEED the message. Already liberal towns that are supportive of LGBTQ+ issues. That's the reason I think Ripped Man is right about a tour. The message won't get to those that need it, as they won't bother to see it.
Voter Peron- I had the same exact thought.
If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it?
These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.
With many powerful female characters and low production costs, this will do well in schools on your coasts. Middle America and the South will not embrace it as much. Especially since they’re so criticized in it. I hope I’m wrong about that, but I’d be surprised.
"Man, when the New York Times writes against popular opinion, we crucify them on here spouting about how much they don’t matter anymore. "
Guess, uh, we’re having a change of heart on that tonight? "
Excellent post because it is so true. The NYT reviews still matter, maybe not as much now as it did many years ago. We all know that every show still waits for that review to come out more than any other one. I am glad it got a good review, because it seemed like it would be fun show to see. I would be curious to read what Brantley thought of the show and if it would be much different than Green.