Thoughts:
The opening number was really bad and I was extremely disappointed. Remember eleven years ago when Neil Patrick Harris blew all of our minds with a huge, classic Broadway showtune full of clever lyrics and references to all of the shows that season that even had a bit of a rap section near the end to appeal to people who enjoy contemporary music who are for some reason watching the Tony Awards? Gone are those days. I think that not having Neil Patrick just makes the Tony openings somehow worse. It can't be a coincidence that the shows he hosted and produced had the best openings consistently. I think that the only logical explanation is that he has a better understanding of theatre and thought that was an important thing to make really good. I don't blame Ariana DeBose, though she's not really the best host. I think she can be great at moments, I really do feel she deserved her Oscar for West Side Story, I just think that she's not very versatile. I feel like, if they can't get back Neil Patrick Harris, there are a lot of better people. I would take James Corden over Ariana DeBose. He has a lot of hosting experience at the very least. Or get back Kristin Chenoweth. I'd take Idina Menzel, she's famous enough. Or Bette Midler! Or Andrew Rannells and Josh Gad. Their bit of the broadcast was one of the funniest and most inspired bits, they're always great. They could definitely host. I love the Tony Awards because, at the end of the day, even the crappy performances are exciting on account of the fact that Broadway is inherently exciting. But this year was not great.
My favorite performances were probably Cabaret and Merrily. I completely understand people's problems with Eddie Redmayne but I've always liked him more than most. I think that a lot of it has to do with how much I love oldschool theatre, which does involve a lot of exaggeration in physicality and facial expressions. Harvey Fierstein is my favorite Broadway actor (loved his bit by the way everything he says is amazing) and he similarly loves those wacky, exaggerated choices. I do think the camera wasn't doing Eddie any favors, though. The ensemble was great and I felt the vocal performance Eddie gave was unexpectedly excellent. I will say, though, Alan Cumming was a whole lot better. And Joel Grey. But I never expected Eddie to be as good as them. Merrily, as I have said again and again, is my favorite show I have ever seen on Broadway with the possible exception of John Cameron Mitchell in Hedwig. I felt that all three central performances were approaching the kind of greatness you very rarely see from contemporary Broadway performers anymore, and Jonathan and Daniel's victories were so special to me. This is a show I have loved since I fell in love with Sondheim, and this production was so amazing and this felt like a victory lap. I understand criticism of the fact that there wasn't as much malice as necessary, but go back and really watch Daniel Radcliffe's eyes in those moments when you feel Jonathan's somewhat sinister insistence... Nowhere near as heart shattering as seeing the full song in the context of the show, but for those that know the show I do feel they were still remaining very firmly in character. Honestly I wanted them to sing Now You Know, but I understand they wanted to show us Jonathan Groff and Now You Know also might run too long or something. There was a part of me praying they'd do Franklin Shepard Inc. It doesn't happen often that they'll do a big solo like that anymore, but they used to do that all the time. Andrew Rannells singing I Believe in Book of Mormon comes to mind. And Daniel Radcliffe is such a huge star that it surprises me they didn't want to show him off. Whatever, I love Merrily and this production is my favorite version of it ever.
I thought Tommy was actually alright. I mean, the problems everybody has said are definitely true, but it was exciting and showy and powerful. I feel like, if somebody happened to be flipping through and saw that, they'd wanna go see the show. I know it's actually a terrible production but the performance wasn't really that bad. And then there's the Hell's Kitchen performance. Um. It was fine. I thought a lot of the vocals were very good. It wasn't very clear what it was about though. Illinoise had some great dancing, I think it was definitely good, but I'm not at all sure what it was about???? Outsiders was cool but it was a bit sloppy. I know Brody Grant (well "know" as in I met him a few times before he got to Broadway) so it was very special to me to see him killing it up there, but the show is whatever. The In Memorium just reminded me of how cool it was to see Andrea Bocelli and his son on the Oscars so that was a bit of a no go for me. Good vocal performance though. The Chita part was cool, I miss her. Hillary Clinton being a Tony nominee and yet not being the Democratic nominee is very funny to me and Suffs was good. I hope it gets to be very successful. I thought it was an excellent show, but this maybe wasn't the best number ever to show what the show is really like. Stereophonic felt confusing and kind of misguided. It's a great show but this did not show it. Water for Elephants was cool but I'd be lying if I said I remembered the song at all.
And I think it's amazing that Ben Platt gave Daniel Radcliffe his Tony, since Ben Platt is going to be playing Charley Kringas in the movie. I think this is a big, career redefining role for Daniel Radcliffe. I hope he does more musicals. I can't stress enough how phenomenal he is in Merrily. The tickets are so expensive now that nobody will get to see it but if you can only see one show out of the Tony winners definitely go see Merrily.