Universal's WICKED Films - News & Discussion Thread — Page 44
Posted: 6/9/23 at 5:23pm
https://www.instagram.com/p/CtSKjp1Agw_/
Cynthia Erivo just filmed I'm Not That Girl
Updated On: 6/9/23 at 05:23 PM
Posted: 6/9/23 at 6:52pm
And Part Two is subtitled “For Good.” That’s new info, right?
Posted: 6/9/23 at 9:17pm
TaffyDavenport said: "And Part Two is subtitled “For Good.” That’s new info, right?"
Jon Chu said it's a placeholder subtitle
Posted: 6/19/23 at 10:51pm
Bowen Yang confirmed on WWHL that Dillamond is a puppet and that the voice actor hasn't been cast yet.
Posted: 6/19/23 at 10:59pm
Tag said: "Bowen Yang confirmed on WWHL that Dillamond is a puppet and that the voice actor hasn't been cast yet."
The practical effects and sets and now puppets… I’m so excited. (But let’s see what the puppet looks like, too, of course. lol.)
Posted: 6/19/23 at 11:48pm
I'm betting the flying monkeys will be puppets too. I don't mean to sound hastily though
Posted: 6/20/23 at 12:17pm
Updated release
Wicked Part One: Nov 27th 2024
Wicked Part Two: Nov 26 2025
Updated On: 6/20/23 at 12:17 PM
Posted: 6/20/23 at 12:42pm
Tag said: "Bowen Yang confirmed on WWHL that Dillamond is a puppet and that the voice actor hasn't been cast yet."
Posted: 6/20/23 at 1:20pm
Tag said: "Bowen Yang confirmed on WWHL that Dillamond is a puppet and that the voice actor hasn't been cast yet."
I think he means they're using a puppet as a stand-in to act opposite which will be CGI'd in later. The real piece of information is that he said "they're gonna cast HER later" despite Dillamond being traditionally a male. Gives fuel to the rumours that Idina is playing Dillamond.
Posted: 6/20/23 at 1:22pm
If I were Idina Menzel, I think I'd prefer my association with WICKED to be left at being the original creator of the leading role of Elphaba rather than as a CGI supporting goat in the movie.
Posted: 6/20/23 at 1:25pm
Plannietink08 said: "Tag said: "Bowen Yang confirmed on WWHL that Dillamond is a puppet and that the voice actor hasn't been cast yet."
I think he means they're using a puppet as a stand-in to act opposite which will be CGI'd in later. The real piece of information is that he said "they're gonna cast HER later" despite Dillamond being traditionally a male. Gives fuel to the rumours that Idina is playing Dillamond."
My partner uses she or her all the time to talk about his guy friends …it could be anything really
Posted: 6/20/23 at 1:38pm
QueenAlice said: "If I were Idina Menzel, I think I'd prefer my association with WICKED to be left at being the original creator of the leading role of Elphaba rather than as a CGI supporting goat in the movie."
Completely agree. I hope to the highest heavens it isn’t Idina for exactly the reason you’ve described.
Posted: 6/20/23 at 1:40pm
I will also add that having Idina Menzel play a significant role in the film ultimately would be a press distraction, especially against Cynthia Erivo and her performance. How many press junkets would they have to sit through where Idina is asked what she thinks of Cynthia taking on her role, or of Cynthia, how she felt appearing opposite Irina Menzel, whose big shoes she has to fill.
Not worth it.
Let Idina and Kristin do small cameos in "One Short Day" and leave it at that.
Posted: 6/20/23 at 3:32pm
For John Chu to say there’s no way to continue the movie after something as epic as defying gravity, and that’s why it’s in 2 parts, he is proving he doesn’t know what he’s doing directing a musical. Movie musicals have successfully sustained momentum after epic Act 1 finales for literal decades, from Funny Girl to Dreamgirls. This show is not so special that it deserves anything different. This is subtraction by addition.
Hairspray movie comes out in 2007: “I heard they made some edits and It Takes Two and Cooties got cut for time”
Wicked movie comes out in 2024: “…so I guess we’re getting an unplugged acoustic version of something bad happening in Oz??”
Posted: 6/20/23 at 10:43pm
You’re making a lot of assumptions based on literally zero factual basis
Posted: 6/21/23 at 12:40pm
Playbill_Trash said: "For John Chu to say there’s no way to continue the movie after something as epic as defying gravity, and that’s why it’s in 2 parts, he is proving he doesn’t know what he’s doing directing a musical. Movie musicals have successfully sustained momentum after epic Act 1 finales for literal decades, from Funny Girl to Dreamgirls. This show is not so special that it deserves anything different. This is subtraction by addition.
Hairspray movie comes out in 2007: “I heard they made some edits and It Takes Two and Cooties got cut for time”
Wicked movie comes out in 2024: “…so I guess we’re getting an unplugged acoustic version of something bad happening in Oz??”"
Yeah, the director of one of the most critically acclaimed movie musicals of the last two decades, sitting at a 94% on review aggregate Rotten Tomatoes, has no idea how to direct a movie musical, and is totally out of his depth.
Posted: 6/21/23 at 1:59pm
Playbill_Trash said: "For John Chu to say there’s no way to continue the movie after something as epic as defying gravity, and that’s why it’s in 2 parts, he is proving he doesn’t know what he’s doing directing a musical. Movie musicals have successfully sustained momentum after epic Act 1 finales for literal decades, from Funny Girl to Dreamgirls. This show is not so special that it deserves anything different. This is subtraction by addition."
To be fair, I think that’s likely him just putting a positive spin on what was almost certainly a studio mandate. It’s not like he can outright say, “Universal wanted to stretch it into two movies so they could squeeze this IP for all it’s worth, but we’re making the best of it!”
Posted: 6/21/23 at 2:10pm
Although Stephen Schwartz mentioned in a separate interview that they at first kept trying to make it one movie, but they kept finding that they had to cut things they didn't want to cut. There were some areas they wanted to delve into the movie that they were able to do for various reasons in the stage version. They even discussed doing the film with an old-fashioned intermission like long movies back in the day. But ultimately, as they were working on it, they realized they had enough material for two movies.
Posted: 6/21/23 at 5:35pm
They could just be honest and say they're pulling more from the book than just saying "We want to delve into things more" because Wicked as it is just bigger and more tedious story telling to what in the end is going to be a minimum of a 4 hour runtime does not sound to me like a good time. Just annoying.
Posted: 6/21/23 at 6:06pm
Obviously it’s a wait and see situation, but they veered so hard away from the adult aspect of the novel for the musical that it’s hard to see how they are going to pull elements back in without it being a constant tonal shift between the score as we know it and the original elements from the novel.
Like:
Dancing through life
Let’s f*** that Tiger
In front of a crowd
Posted: 6/21/23 at 6:18pm
As post production progresses, maybe they'll change the structure of the film and go with an intermission.
Posted: 6/21/23 at 7:00pm
^ As cool as it would be, I’m not holding my breath for an intermission.
Posted: 6/21/23 at 8:51pm
Globefan said: "As post production progresses, maybe they'll change the structure of the film and go with an intermission."
That is not happening. Not only would theatres be pissed as ****, but you've really got to earn even a 3 hour runtime, and most that are that long, don't.
Movies with excessively long runtime are nothing but an exercise in self indulgence, not making a better movie.
Posted: 6/22/23 at 7:48am
I'll be the first to admit I was vehemently against the idea of two movies. The musical is huge but it's not THAT huge. However, from the leaks and clips that I've seen (including the CinemaCon footage) it seems like they're really going large and that they might very well justify splitting the movies. So far everything looks great so while I'm still not 100% sold I am more in favour of it than I was previously.
BroadwayWorld TV