ljay889 said: "Facts are facts, long and extended preview periods don’t help a show’s reputation and word of mouth. I lived through the Spider-Man fiasco, it wasn’t pretty. I’m not saying this is on the same level, but they need to get ahead of themselves before the industry deems this a problem-ridden production."
Facts are facts, and speculation is speculation. What you said is a speculation. As you said yourself, this isn't on the same level as Spider-Man. Not even remotely close enough to compare. As you know, Spider-Man had a whopping 7 months of previews, was plagued with multiple serious injuries, and on top of that the show was panned. None of that is the case here.
Sure, if people continue to get injured, and if the opening continues to get delayed, then you might end up being right. But so far it's ONE injury and ONE delay, and the production has not been panned. So that's why I call it alarmist.
Also, aside from Spider-Man (which, again, had an unprecedented and incomparable 7 months of previews), what other example can you name of a show that has garnered ill-will within the theatre community because of an extended preview period? Honeymoon in Vegas had 2 months of previews, and sure, people didn't look well on that show, but that's just because it was bad. I don't recall the preview length being a source of animosity.