The title of this article makes it seem more of a sure thing than the actual body of the article does. At least the way I read it, but if true it can’t be a good sign that they’re already looking to stunt casting while still in previews.
They aren't looking to stunt cast anyone. They were on his show, asked to be on his show, and Cameron wanted to get some excitement and applause. Jimmy wasn't going to say no, so yeah maybe it happens once and the man who actually plays him on Broadway still gets paid for that night. It's not big news nor it is actually confirmed.
Saw the matinee yesterday. Wasn’t expecting much and it delivered on not exceeding expectations. Didn’t know anything about the cast (until I read it here). So Van Hughes went on for Russell. I thought he was fine, as all the actors, didn’t have a clue that he wasn’t the regular lead. The music was unmemorable. Very different vibe watching this show after seeing “Some Like It Hot” the night before.
Cases Likes was good as William, like an earlier poster stated, sign him for Back to the Future (it needs all the help it can get). I liked the mother, although she reminded me of Ellen Page. Like others have posted. It’s ok, not groundbreaking. I thought it was more like DEH but without the memorable music and angst with a dash of Rock of Ages.
I had gotten TDF tickets and had great seats, Row G orch center. I started to fall asleep in the later half of the first act. Too many bland ballads mostly sung by Penny Lane.
I guess it might do well? Hard to say, I heard ppl walking out saying “It was the BEST” and wondered if we saw the same show.
Imagine what Jakeim Hart is thinking after hearing Jimmy Fallon might take over his role at random perfs. Probably not how he imagined his Broadway debut to go.
I saw this last night. Unfortunately can't say I enjoyed it.
The show banks on you having a connection to the movie and to cultural references from the time period. I hadn't seen the movie. The plot is easy to follow but the character development is pretty non-existent. The book is slim, it feels like there are 5 lines and a song, 5 lines and a song, repeat for 2.5 hours. The characters can't develop in the book because of how little book there is, and in the score they are stuck repeating "I'm not here to make friends" 50x.
It's not sung through but there are endless songs (the Playbill lists 17 in Act One and 15 in Act Two). Because there are so many songs no song is given the chance to make an impression. Or, there was so much singing that in effect nothing was sung.
I found it to be extremely repetitive, which also manifested visually. 90% of the action during Act One seemed to be staged on a 4 foot strip that runs up and down center stage. Act Two was still very center stage focused, but there were a couple of scenes stage right/stage left which at least gave the eye somewhere different to look.
I'm very interested in what the critics will make of the show. I will remember this one for a long time, and not for good reasons.
"It's a very "This could maybe one day hopefully if then maybe" kind of moment.
"And I'd expect the reviews to all be mixed."
I agree, I can't see this show getting "raves" but also don't think it will get "trashed". I would like to see it but can't get to NYC until after the holidays.
Mixed would be a blessing now. Haven't read one good review for this show yet.
A Chorus Line revival played its final Broadway performance on August 17, 2008. The tour played its final performance on August 21, 2011. A new non-equity tour started in October 2012 played its final performance on March 23, 2013. Another non-equity tour launched on January 20, 2018. The tour ended its US run in Kansas City and then toured throughout Japan August & September 2018.
As I read these bleak reviews I cannot help but wonder about why the reviews for the show were so rapturous when it was on the West Coast. I've seen this happen before and often. West Coast raves, East Coast pans...and vice versa. What is that about?
New Yorkers are harsher. It's a fun show, a replica of the movie, and it does not reinvent the wheel. I think it will do alright honestly, critics opinions are becoming increasingly less important to ticket buyers.
pethian said: "As I read these bleak reviews I cannot help but wonder about why the reviews for the show were so rapturous when it was on the West Coast. I've seen this happen before and often. West Coast raves, East Coast pans...and vice versa. What is that about?"
Charles McNulty knows absolutely nothing about musicals. Never has, never will.
And it’s really not about audiences but about critics. They want to be the one to give the glowing reviews to the next big hit Broadway show. It seems most out of town tryouts get decent to positive reviews. (which made something like Devil Wears Prada even juicer).
Any movie to musical adaption is going to be an uphill battle. Why would I spend $100+ for something I can see on Netflix?
i agree that reviews dont dictate success the way they used to, but i cant remember the last time a poorly reviewed show, without a wow factor built-in sell (like MJ's music, like Hugh Jackman) took off. Maybe I'm misremembering.
Those aren't great. About as middling as you can get, with the NYT negativity tipping the scale down. Indifference won't sell tickets, and this is a show that needed strong reviews. Depending on the ad campaign they have planned and money in the bank, this could be gone in January. $575K last week is not a good start, assuming it costs somewhere in the 650 range or higher to just break even.
It's an entertaining show with some nice tunes and performances.
Ouch. Well, I love this show. I’ve seen it three times so far and will go back again in a few weeks. I can’t see it lasting a long time now which I think is a shame.