I don't know WHY people are suggesting Rob Marshall. His movies are a miz of art, sexuality, and style. Wicked requires fantasy, magic, and SFX. Rob Marshall would be a terrible choice for Wicked. His talents are Great for Chicago, Nine, and maybe other musicals like Cabaret, Sweet Charity and other projects in that category of musicals.
Tim Burton is great for Fantasy, Magic, and lots of SFX, but he also is very dark, and that will not fly for Wicked. Wicked DOES need an element of darkness, but not to the level of Tim Burton's taste.
A great directorr for Wicked, IMO, would be the Chris Columbus. He did a terrible job for Rent (even though rent is not a show meant for the screen by ANY director, imo), but think of the Justice he did for his Harry Potter movies. The way he told the sentimental story mixed with the fantasy elements was excellent. As long as the script is well written (because Rent's was garbage) he'll be great.
"There's nothing good on. The media hates Christmas. The media loves vampires, though. Maybe they will show a Twilight Christmas." -Danmeg's 10 year old son.
Chris Columbus would be a good choice. I always pictured the Wicked movie to be somewhat like Harry Potter. Especially the Shiz scenes (similar to Hogwarts)
Chris Columbus would sanitize WICKED into total oblivion, there'd just be nothing left. His sanitized Potter films are among the weakest in the franchise. That CHAMBER OF SECRETS thing is a disaster.
Alfonso Cuaron would make a terrific WICKED. I'd pay to see that.
"If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about the answers." Thomas Pynchon, GRAVITY'S RAINBOW
"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." Philip K. Dick
My blog: http://www.roscoewrites.blogspot.com/
This all seems pretty iffy to me. Imdb is not known for being extremely reliable.
"The gods who nurse this universe think little of mortals' cares. They sit in crowds on exclusive clouds and laugh at our love affairs. I might have had a real romance if they'd given me a chance. I loved him, but he didn't love me. I wanted him, but he didn't want me. Then the gods had a spree and indulged in another whim. Now he loves me, but I don't love him." - Cole Porter
Roscoe, I agree. Chris Columbus would be an absolutely horrible choice to direct the Wicked film. Alfonso Cuaron on the other hand...I'd gladly pay to see his take on Wicked.
I just hope that they stay a little truer to the novel and maybe include some of the darker elements in the film. It probably won't happen, but I'd love for them to cut the cop-out ending from the musical and just have the film end the way the novel did.
"You drank a charm to kill John Proctor's wife! You drank a charm to kill Goody Proctor!" - Betty Parris to Abigail Williams in Arthur Miller's The Crucible
It will definitely be the musical Wicked, not the book...no point in pressing the matter. However, later on I'd imagine some sort of Wicked novel/mini-series will appear on tv perhaps.
They'll keep in a lot more of the novel I'd imagine, a lot was only cut for the stage show (timing etc) but in the film, a lot more time will be available. It will begin a lot more like the book I feel, because Glinda floating down in a bubble won't be as impressive on film...starting with the 'beginnings' of Elphaba would be great.
I too always associated Shiz with Hogwarts, but a bit less cheery...in the film they need to be careful to not Harry Potterize the place. Same goes for the Emerald City, they need to stay away from what the Wizard of Oz gave us...make it less Disney and literal with all the green.
They probably would keep the ending of the show, because the film needs to appeal to children/teenagers and making it so sombre would not go down well. Plus, I'd hazzard a guess and say the story line will be almost exactly the musical plot, but thickened out - rather than changing anything major.
I am actually quite excited. I think if Wicked had a Moulin Rouge-y feel, it could be very interesting. I don't think Wicked was a Rob Marshall project. It would've turned out too much like Chicago and that is not how wicked should be done. Let him direct a Curtains movie or something like that. I'm still waiting for Tim Burton to do Into the woods.
I'd like to maybe see a prologue that shows Elphaba's childhood, but it probably wouldn't fly (excuse the pun) because it's a little too dark to suit the tone set by the musical.
I wonder if they'll expand on the whole animal/Animal rights subplot? Or will they cut it out altogether? In the musical it's introduced and then abruptly dropped.
"You drank a charm to kill John Proctor's wife! You drank a charm to kill Goody Proctor!" - Betty Parris to Abigail Williams in Arthur Miller's The Crucible
They need someone darker (I love the idea of Cuaron) to tackle it. It's a dark piece in some ways and would work best if interpreted a bit darker on screen.
As long as he tones down that spastic cinematography of his. I got a headache watching Romeo and Juliet.
Butters, go buy World of Warcraft, install it on your computer, and join the online sensation before we all murder you.
--Cartman: South Park
ATTENTION FANS: I will be played by James Barbour in the upcoming musical, "BroadwayWorld: The Musical."
Baz is only listed as "attached," meaning there is NO confirmation. It is NOT set in stone. If you recall, Sam Mendes was once "attached" to SWEENEY (something I'm still bitter did not come to pass).
I am excited if this is true, but more perturbed about the horrendous typo on the Australia poster on the other page. "The director of Moulin Rogue?!" I thought it was Moulin rouge...
That poster was fan-made. Note the "POSTER MADE BYYYY:" credit.
And people...this is not, not, NOT going to be a dark adaptation of the book. Let's stop bringing it up! Do you really think they would do that? Maybe somewhere down the line -- but not this movie, not now. No one would risk that.
And to those STILL attacking Chris Columbus' film-version of RENT. You ARE aware that Jonathan Larson's family was fully in control of the film AND of ALL the changes being done in it. If you're going to attack anyone... it should be them for allowing Jonathan Larson's work to be tarnished, etc.
Chris Columbus could have suggested anything he pretty damn well pleased but it was Jonathan Larson's family that had to ALLOW him to go thru with them. The Larson clan supported ALL of Chris Columbus' changes.
Luhrman is one of my favorite directors. Guillermo del Toro would probably be my first pic for a WICKED film, Luhrman would probably not have made my list, but I think he'll make an interesting film either way. Rob Marshall is great but he is completely wrong for the project.
"Some people can thrive and bloom living life in a living room, that's perfect for some people of one hundred and five. But I at least gotta try, when I think of all the sights that I gotta see, all the places I gotta play, all the things that I gotta be at"