As a Broadway fan, I do believe the play has flaws. My biggest criticism is a show should stand on its own. A person having never read the books or watched the films should have the same experience as me. To really enjoy the Cursed Child, you need to haveread most of the books or watched the films,especially Goblet of Fire."
I do agree that the play itself has flaws, but it still didn’t detract from it being one of the best things I’ve seen in years. I predict most of the reviews will state that on some level.
However, I think it’s wrong to suggest that the play should stand alone in this situation. In a sense it can and does stand alone (like the 7 books do to an extent), but this has been billed as the 8th story to the Harry Potter saga. Naturally it’s going to rely on characters, plot points, and situations from the book series. I think the show can be enjoyed as a spectacle from someone who is new to the books, but they obviously wouldn’t understand all the innuendos, references, and revelations made throughout the play that give it an extra push. This is also why I’ve been recommending people who don’t know anything about the books to not see it. That’s not a fault of the play itself.
-There's the muddle in the middle. There's the puddle where the poodle did the piddle."