Can anyone comment on the Danny Strong book? The show's problems fall into the Candide camp - to use the broadest definition associated with that legend - all score, weakish storytelling to hold an audience. Chess has always suffered from a shortage of relatable stakes, i.e., making Cold War specific character issues feel immediate. Yes, Russia is, if anything, more in the foreground than it has been for two decades. But the defection from communism angle is organic to a very distant time. Making the trio's plight emotionally full now is no easier. And it's a show in which women are relegated to subsidiary positions. Yes, of course, historically accurate, but it's a bro show, with women on the periphery, no matter how great their songs. I'm a devotee of the music, and played it on vinyl and tape back in the day. I'll never lose my affection for the ways it wears the heart on the sleeve, or the jump from Merano to Bangkok, giving the context global variety. But these three people - how can they engage as fully as they must? I hope the Strong work found a way in. The Richard Nelson book, literate, sophisticated, and well crafted, didn't do the show any favors. And that's the problem, baked into the DNA. Even when Chess is smart it's coolly distant in how it lands, particularly its second half. It's a lot of set-up, and then ... it just finishes without a grand enough stopping place, more befitting a chamber piece than a big musical.
"I'm a comedian, but in my spare time, things bother me." Garry Shandling
Updated On: 1/2/25 at 01:08 PM