Company Commentary Thread — Page 10
Posted: 2/21/08 at 12:19am
Funny, because I had that experience with Spring Awakening (feeling that the songs never failed to stop the action of the show cold), but don't have that problem at all with Company because it isn't a narrative musical. The fact that it's so fragmentary and that it's made clear that it's in Bobby's head makes the song/scene progressions natural. You may not like the music, but I can't imagine the show working half as well without it. Personally, I think the score has some of Sondheim's best melodies and (especially) lyrics. But different tastes, right?
I think the filming was stunning. It completely captured the beauty of the show and is truly the next-best thing to having seen it live. It's also a capture of a wonderful performance, and I thought that all of the actors were at their best. "Being Alive" left me literally shaking, which is something that just doesn't happen to me.
Updated On: 2/21/08 at 12:19 AM
Posted: 2/21/08 at 12:21am
Posted: 2/21/08 at 12:21am
Posted: 2/21/08 at 12:23am
A few days ago, I lent my friend the cast recording for the show, which he returned to me yesterday, stating how he "loved it". Naturally I mentioned that it would be on PBS, so hopefully tomorrow we'll chat about it.
Overall, a fantastic show -- but this was to be expected, aye?
"Yes, the brutalities of progress are called revolutions. When they are over, men recognize that the human race has been harshly treated but it has moved forward." - Les Miserables
Updated On: 2/21/08 at 12:23 AM
Posted: 2/21/08 at 12:24am
Except.. I really wasn't trying to make any claims. I apologize if it came off that way, because really, all I meant by what I initially said was that for me it went a bit beyond simple dislike of the score; the music actually made me want to stop watching. It was something I actually had to conciously look beyond. There are some shows where I may not particularly like a the score, but it doesn't get in the way of my over all enjoyment of the piece. This one pretty much did. THAT'S all I meant- and again, I apologize if it came across as implying that I think they actually SHOULD take the score out. I just meant that for me personally, since I KNOW the story and the character development that happens within the songs, I could mute the TV during the musical parts and turn them back on during the staight parts, and I think that I would actually enjoy the show MORE. :)
Posted: 2/21/08 at 12:24am
Posted: 2/21/08 at 12:25am
Well, I admire Doyle's vision, I'm not sold on it for this show. I thought the instruments on stage were distracting. And where was the second piano? Raul gets up from the piano in Being Alive and yet it still plays? By stripping away the scenery and props (for the most part), he stripped the show down to its emotional core, but left it out there raw. I didn't feel the ambiguity that Sondheim says they were aiming for. I felt more of the negativity. On this board, I may be lonely in my views, but that's okay. The one touch I did like was the final blowing out of the candles, the look and the smile.
Posted: 2/21/08 at 12:26am
I have heard this before. Years ago, in HS, I got the OCR of COMPANY and loaned to a friend who was also a budding musical theatre afficianado like myself. The next day he came back and said "COMPANY stinks!" For along time he refused to even give it a second listen. But as his career in musical theatre took off and other actors & directors began urging him to give it another chance, he finally did and now it is one of his favourites.
Sondheim's scores are so full of musical and lyrical ideas that it is impossible to fully appreciate from a single listening. (Like Mozart's music reveals more layers with each subsequent listen.) I was lucky to be a teen when COMPANY and FOLLIES and PACIFIC OVERTURES came along. I had the time then (and the patience) to sit and listen to enire albusm with following along in the librettos.
I suspect after a half dozen listens you will at least appreciate it more, if not like it more.
Cast albums are NOT "soundtracks."
Live theatre does not use a "soundtrack." If it did, it wouldn't be live theatre!
I host a weekly one-hour radio program featuring cast album selections as well as songs by cabaret, jazz and theatre artists. The program, FRONT ROW CENTRE is heard Sundays 9 to 10 am and also Saturdays from 8 to 9 am (eastern times) on www.proudfm.com
Posted: 2/21/08 at 12:27am
Posted: 2/21/08 at 12:31am
"I am sorry but it is an unjust world and virtue is only triumphant in theatricle performances" The Mikado
Posted: 2/21/08 at 12:32am
Matt Castle plays the keyboard upstage.
Posted: 2/21/08 at 12:37am
I see- hence why I have now apologized multiple times for having said it like that, and further explained myself so as to make it clearer what I meant :)
aaand I am done with this convo now because I don't want it to get into a long, drawn out, unnecessary argument.
anyway,
so who else wants other shows to be taped and put on PBS!? Honestly, why can't they do this for like... every show? It's SUCH a treat to be able to see *sigh*
Updated On: 2/21/08 at 12:37 AM
Posted: 2/21/08 at 12:37am
it's truly one of my favorite recordings.
Posted: 2/21/08 at 12:39am
Esparza has some of the best facial reactions I've ever seen.
They can either drive you into hysterics or make you want to bawl your eyes out... and he just delivers each 'look' brilliantly.
"Yes, the brutalities of progress are called revolutions. When they are over, men recognize that the human race has been harshly treated but it has moved forward." - Les Miserables
Updated On: 2/21/08 at 12:39 AM
Posted: 2/21/08 at 12:42am
Too late. It was unnecessary of you to derail the conversation in the first place to whine about how you don't like Sondheim. Again. If you don't like the show, why do you keep coming into threads and starting arguments over it (then running away as soon as people start calling you on your illogical, inaccurate claims)?
Wanting life but never knowing how
Updated On: 2/21/08 at 12:42 AM
Posted: 2/21/08 at 12:44am
I remember now.
Wishes come true, not free.
Posted: 2/21/08 at 12:52am
Posted: 2/21/08 at 12:59am
"I am sorry but it is an unjust world and virtue is only triumphant in theatricle performances" The Mikado
Posted: 2/21/08 at 1:03am
They need to get over themselves.
Posted: 2/21/08 at 1:32am
I just came back from the screening at the Laurie Beechman, and I have to admit I'm feeling a bit weird. I'm trying to take it all in, but I have to admit that I was so engrossed when I was watching that I realized somewhere in the second act that I was holding my breath.
I actually didn't get to see the show when it was on Broadway last year because I was living in California, so I was really determined to take advantage of seeing the airing with some kind of audience.
I had rather high expectations for the show, as I've listened to the music both from this and the original cast and find myself (sadly) relating a lot to Bobby at this point in my life. I thought the whole thing was incredibly touching and the direction really gave a sense of movement to the piece. My friend who went with me (who had seen it on Broadway) said that she would have liked to have seen more of the movement around the edge of the stage in the film, but I thought that everything flowed really well and did a great job of portraying the show as a rather tight, cohesive piece (although even I will admit that the feet into the spotlight was a little off-putting).
Each of the cast members really had moments to shine, and everyone assumed their roles with a natural ease that made the characters extremely accessible. I can still see Raul's heartbreaking face at the end of "Side by Side by Side," and I still hear everyone's voice calling out Bobby's name in my head. The only thing that really bugged me (and I don't know if I was imagining things) was that it seemed like the film wasn't corresponding with the music during the end of "Ladies Who Lunch," which was incredibly distracting during such a pivotal time in the song.
It was so great to see everyone applauding after musical numbers and just thoroughly enjoying what they were watching. If what aired tonight was any indication of how the experience of the actual show was, I'm really sorry I missed it.
Posted: 2/21/08 at 1:37am
It was the most beautiful thing I've ever seen. I'm so lucky to have been able to see it several times.
Posted: 2/21/08 at 3:04am
Updated On: 2/21/08 at 03:04 AM
Posted: 2/21/08 at 3:34am
This being said, I didn't care for John Doyle's production which to me was cold and clinical. Stripping away the specific locations and sort of setting the show at a cocktail party made a somewhat confusing story more confusing. I found no symbolism in the characters not looking at one another. Doyle did the same thing in his staging of The Rise and Fall of the City of Mahagonny. I'd say this is his signature style. I found many of the scenes to be flat and all the same. How many times do we need to see the actors walk or march around the edge of the stage? Didn't anyone point out to Doyle that Marta's speech about dressing all in black makes no sense when she is wearing all black?
Raul was okay, but at times he seemed all at one level with two or three expressions. The Ladies Who Lunch is a great song when it isn't shouted. The rest of the cast was just there.
I strongly disagree with the praise for Lonny Price's TV direction. He must have a short attention span. There were many times when the camera was in the wrong place or showed something that didn't add anything. The over uses of cuts in the editing, the pulling back and the zooming into a close up, and those over head shots only called attention to them. Camera tricks don't equal good directing.
To me, the filming of The Light in the Piazza was much better. Kirk Browning recently died, Lonny Price should study Mr. Browning's many productions and learn something. Mr. Browning set the bar very high.
Posted: 2/21/08 at 3:37am
BroadwayWorld TV