Saw part 1 last night and part 2 tonight. The Lyric renovation is spectacular, from the minute you enter to the moment you take your seat. We sat in the second to last row of the balcony slightly off center and the view is perfection.
I will say I am very glad to have seen this. The production is a technical marvel and features some truly stunning stage craft. However, each progressive act has diminishing returns. Act one is one big WOW after another, whetting the appetite for more. Then act two is somewhat less satisfying (that clunky kitchen fight between Draco and Harry - oy!), but features enough twists to satisfy what’s missing in terms of ingenuity.
Then... part 2 happens and it felt like all the air was let out. Gone are the remarkably well-designed sleight of hand tricks in favor of heavy-handed plot, spewing flames, and wire flight galore; all things we see in less imaginative spectacles than the experience part 1 sets up Cursed Child to be. (Also, rarely has there been a worse character written for the stage than Delphi Diggory.)
The problem, for me, is that the creators seem to have focused too heavily on giving the Potter fandom “what they want,” which is borrowed time with the characters they know and love. And I understand that completely. But then why introduce two rich, complicated characters like Scorpius and Albus, only to sideline them at every turn in order to highlight the inner life of Harry, one of the play’s least interesting characters? This results in so many missed opportunities for something more surprising or interesting to develop, separate from the main characters from the books.
Again, I’m glad I saw it. But I can’t help but feel that John Tiffany saw how plot heavy and clunky the script was and frontloaded all the “gosh wow” into the first half just to make sure people returned for part 2. Clearly, many enjoyed the whole experience, but I feel less happy the more I think about the progression of the two evenings.
Updated On: 3/29/18 at 12:08 AM