Jarethan said: "I plan to re-read The Crucible (which I have previously read and have seen several times) because I want to take another look to see if Proctor was quite the predator that this play needs him to be for the premise to be airtight. As I remembered it, Proctor was a flawed man who allowed himself to be seduced by Abagail, who was clearly still a minor by today's definition; in this play the teacher is clearly a predator and is always looking for the next student to groom). slight difference, at least to me."
I read The Crucible in preparation for seeing John Proctor is the Villain, and I think all of the points made in the show are valid. You're right that we don't have any reason to believe that Proctor is a serial predator, but Abigail was indeed not only a minor, but his servant with very little power over the situation. After the affair, he is practically prostrate with contrition for what he did to his wife, but shows no remorse whatsoever for what he did to Abigail, and is committed to destroying her to save his wife.
I fully recognize that Arthur Miller was writing a play about standing up for truth when the world is going mad with lies, not one about sexual assault. I can read it the way Miller intended while still also seeing how correct the young women in the new play are, from their own perspective.
Finally, I agree that this was the best thing I saw on Broadway all season, and there were a lot of shows that I liked!
Updated On: 6/6/25 at 09:25 PM