PipingHotPiccolo said: "ColorTheHours048 said: "
I really feel like I’m taking crazy pills when people talk about this show like it was unfairly derided. To me, and to almost everyone I’ve spoken to about it in person, it’s a conceptual mess."
i hear you but i feel like *im* crazy because while these are perfectly legitimate criticisms of the show, and i agree with some of them, the response to Suffs has been "solid but middling score" or to Hells Kitchen as "dumb as bricks book but great songs" and then Lempicka feels more like "lots of solid elements but since they dont cohere properly the entire thing is a total irredeemable mess." i dont quite get it-- and to each their own! but it just seems oddly harsh. and i really have no skin in this game, and agree the show has its problems."
Yes, well said! It feels to me like Lempicka is being derided because it's an ambitious show. I do not get why people are taking such glee in bashing it while having little-to-nothing to say about middling new shows like The Notebook, Water for Elephants, The Great Gatsby (and not for nothing... those shows are all based on existing properties). And the criticism is certainly harsher than other recently opened shows like Hell's Kitchen (another jukebox show...) and Schele Williams's baffling revival of The Wiz. I also have no skin in this game, but having followed the show for years now, I will admit that I am perplexed by the response. To me, this is exciting new musical theatre. I don't think that it succeeds in every regard, but I think it's interesting, fun, original, engaging, melodic, and dynamic - and filled with great performances.