Posted: 3/23/25 at 11:31am
Sammy232 said: "Dolly80 said: "Kad said: "These production photos are oddly strange and lifeless. Typically stars have photo approval and their tastes can be somewhat baffling, but these are just... dull."
They perfectly represent this dull, lifeless production then."
Graphic designer here - I think it's very hard to capture any emotion, feeling for the show etc. when there is a bare stage, minimial costuming etc. Take a look at the revivals of Betrayal and Doll's house for comparison. But on top of that, the photographs are just really not great so it just makes for a mess. These are basically useless, but I guess at how their tickets are selling it's not really even necessary since these are primarily shot for advertising purposes."
I can't really blame the photographer here. Julieta Cervantes, who took these, is a talented and well-regarded theatre photographer, extremely capable of taking compelling images of performance. There's nothing technically wrong with them- they're just boring and say little about the show. This is squarely a decision on the part of the producers, as they are the ones who ultimately choose which photos to use and how the photos should be directed. Othello is a play with huge emotions- even a lackluster production should have actors showing rage, passion, grief- so it's weird that these photos capture nothing but blank or stern faces (and Washington solely in profile for some reason?).
Again, I think back to Sam Gold's Othello at NYTW. It was also done in modern military dress and with very spartan sets (the theatre was basically turned into a floor-to-ceiling plywood box). But the production photos are very compelling, moody, and emotive.