RENT movie garners exactly zero Golden Globe nods! — Page 6
Posted: 12/13/05 at 4:31pm
Yet you take obvious joy in calling Lost in Translation a sleeping pill and all that...
Posted: 12/13/05 at 4:33pm
Posted: 12/13/05 at 4:34pm
Posted: 12/13/05 at 4:37pm
I'm not a Rent head. I had never seen the show/heard any of the music before I saw this movie. I wasn't even sure if I would like it or not--I was totally unbiased when I sat down in the movie theater. How could I have possibly talked myself into liking something that I knew hardly anything about? I wasn't some delusional long-time fan of the Broadway show, determined to love every minute of the movie. But I STILL loved every minute of it anyway. I thought it was one of the best movies I had seen in a long time. I am truly shocked the film is doing so poorly.
If you didn't like the movie, that's okay. Excuse the cliche, but--different strokes for different folks. But I have to agree with what everyone else has been saying--be respectful about it. And, of course--that goes for all those who liked it as well. Don't be hostile towards anyone who disliked it. Not that you would...I'm just saying.
Posted: 12/13/05 at 4:37pm
It is like before 2001 THE LORD OF THE RINGS was a masterpiece of literature that needed to be adapted, the quality of the films does not effect that.
Posted: 12/13/05 at 4:40pm
Make sense?
Posted: 12/13/05 at 4:41pm
Excuse me? I know, Anthony can defend himself, but considering he spent more time debating and discussing the movie with these naysayers than the actual fans, he was anything but dismissive. Maybe you're the one in need of a dictionary, not him.
Wanting life but never knowing how
Updated On: 12/13/05 at 04:41 PM
Posted: 12/13/05 at 4:43pm
SWEENEY TODD may be terrible or may be great, we will only know if it gets made.
The failure of the RENT movie may have an effect on whether it gets made at all, if it doesn't get made it has no chance to be great at all.
Posted: 12/13/05 at 4:44pm
I really don't want to get into *that* argument again.
Updated On: 12/13/05 at 04:44 PM
Posted: 12/13/05 at 4:44pm
You can't just say that it was not a better made movie. Yes, this is your opinion, but the way you are trying to convey it is that it is fact.
In the "Arts", there is not cut-out shape of what a good movie/piece of art/song/anything is. I believe that it's impossible to have guidlines to what a good or bad thing is. You may find a majority of people that agree with you, but that still doesn't constitute it as fact (This is true about what anyone says about it--or any other movie.). It is opinion, just the same as what I or anyone else says about the film.
(This post turned out not to be directed at you in particular. It sort of evolved.)
Updated On: 12/13/05 at 04:44 PM
Posted: 12/13/05 at 4:45pm
Posted: 12/13/05 at 4:47pm
Posted: 12/13/05 at 4:47pm
Posted: 12/13/05 at 4:48pm
You thought right.
Posted: 12/13/05 at 4:49pm
Posted: 12/13/05 at 4:49pm
Posted: 12/13/05 at 4:49pm
Posted: 12/13/05 at 5:04pm
Posted: 12/13/05 at 5:07pm
Second, I'm really beginning to despise when a dislike/hatred of a show or film's fans results in dimissing of the show, film, actor, etc. Those of you who disliked it gave valid reasons for that but still admitted part of your happiness at the no nominations for the film has come from the other fans who in some way have bothered you, encouraging you to gleefully post about the lack of nominations. This has happened w/ Wicked as well. It seems that someone's dislike of a media can grow immensely when other fans rave about it and such and even if that is human nature, it still upsets me. They become more determined to prove the lovers wrong and sometimes I think unconsciously it encourages their dislike for the whole project.
Furthermore, I certainly have not read all of the threads so there may be quite a few of posts and if so I apologize, but most of the posts I have read about those who enjoyed the movie did admit flaws--none of them(well...most of them didn't) claimed it was the best thing ever but explained that it still touched them and was enjoyable. To dismiss those who cried during a film is ridiculous--you honestly have never cried ot been touched by something that you're like umm why the hell am I crying? It happens.
And Em is right, it is indeed hypocritical to support the film enough to buy tickets for it even though you didn't like it or watch it, but then to celebrate its lack of awards.
Finally, as much as it's necessary to hear from those who love a show/film some flaws they acknowledge, it would also be nice for those who say such negative things about it allow some aspect they enjoyed. Just like nothing is perfect, I don't think there's anything that doesn't have one redeeming quality to it. I think Phantom last year felt victim to this kind of thinking. I will admit the movie was quite flawed, but I absolutely love it. I personally think it was robbed of the oscar for cinematography and art direction and at least a nomination for costuming--I can't imagine the distate for the film itself didn't influence decisions to not acknowledge good aspects of it.
I was surprised by the lack of nominations, if only because I thought there are only certain films in the musical/comedy category that are esteemed enough to get a nomination, which I thought might ensure Rent's nomination. I very well could have underestimated the comedies of this year, as P&P is the only one I've seen.
Posted: 12/13/05 at 5:08pm
Posted: 12/13/05 at 5:09pm
There is nothing wrong, of course, with being so emotionally attached to a piece of work - espcecially one with a messages such as Rent's.
The problem is, there are other people, such as the person who began this thread, who take advantage of Rent fans who are, sometimes, overly attached to anything Rent.
So why don't we all just settle down. If you like the movie, good! If you didn't, fine! But there's no reason to gloat one way or the other. We are all sick of Rentheads cluttering up BWW, but we are just as sick of the negativity.
Posted: 12/13/05 at 5:09pm
What all of you forget is the simple fact that NO ONE CARES ABOUT MOVIE MUSICALS EXCEPT US HERE !!!!!! Phantom and Evita movie versions were infinitely more famous than RENT, with very commercial subjects and they both did around 50 million. And you call RENT a big flop with 30 ????
Chicago was a once in a lifetime exception, please let's not fool ourselves that average people are interested in the genre !
And after reading the despicable posts about people being so happy that RENT did not get any nominations, you know what I wish ? That Hollywood, never makes another musical again. If people are so stupid to not understand that if RENT does not do well, the whole genre is traumatised, than let's not have another one, because we sure don't deserve it !!!
Updated On: 12/13/05 at 05:09 PM
Posted: 12/13/05 at 5:27pm
I went to see this film with an optimistic view. I hoped for it to be good and do well, and at the same time I knew that it would at least be worth while with so much of the original cast in it. After watching it I was completely silent on the drive home, processing what I had seen. I was moved, as much as I was when I saw it on Broadway. You don't make up those emotions. I am not an actor: I can't make myself cry for Angel, I can't pretend that my heart is breaking during One Song Glory, I can't act like I'm laughing during Tango: Maureen, and I can not and will not ever delude myself into liking something that is not great. I love Rent, the music, the spirit, the people in it, and now the movie. I like all these things separately or put together, so please don't assume that I don't actually feel what I feel when I watch this film. It has given me the hope that things can get better, the courage to come out to my friends, and a glimpse of what a family looks like- a family of loving, caring friends. You don't make this stuff up.
Posted: 12/13/05 at 5:58pm
For those of us who follow the box office numbers and the awards nominations, we know what is going on. We see what is happening with this film that we love. And for us, it's not about box office receipts, "beating" other films and winning awards. It's about this story being told. It's about Jonathan's legacy living on. It's about inspiring hope and love. And this film has done that for many people. I know what I feel each and every time I watch this movie. I know what I'm crying for and what I smiling for. What I feel and the impact that this movie has on me every time I see it is no delusion. My only wish is that more people would have seen the movie that I saw. I am eternally grateful to everyone who helped make this film, especially Jonathan. It has had an incalculable impact on my life.
BroadwayWorld TV