Kad said: "While whether the marketing’s successful is tbd, it certainly is a stark contrast to something like KPop, which just seemed to plop down on Broadway, do the barest minimum and a half-assed social media engagement campaign, and then act shocked and aggrieved that it flopped."
PREACH. I still am not entirely sure what KPop was about, and certainly never found myself smiling to myself at an aggressive/infectious/clever ad campaign. Shucked reminds me a BIT of that Seth Rudetsky show that was also at the Nederlander, in that it seems to embrace its inherent silliness (corniness.... sorry) which is immediately endearing to me (many?). THAT SAID, silly doesnt generate $100+ prices, HUMOR does, so this WOM is pretty encouraging. And I"d love/expect to see this wave lead to a Tony nom for Alex Newell.
So we have this, Kimberly Akimbo & Some Like It Hot as locks for Tony nominations for Best Musical? What also could be the other two nominees? New York, New York? A Beautiful Noise? KPOP?
A Chorus Line revival played its final Broadway performance on August 17, 2008. The tour played its final performance on August 21, 2011. A new non-equity tour started in October 2012 played its final performance on March 23, 2013. Another non-equity tour launched on January 20, 2018. The tour ended its US run in Kansas City and then toured throughout Japan August & September 2018.
BroadwayBaby6 said: "Is the score good enough to match the book? Robert Horn is incredibly talented but his wonderful book for Tootsie was accompanied by a very middling score. I don't want to see another show when I'm coming out and humming the book."
Tootsie was definitely an interesting balancing act with a score that did little more than accompany Horn's book -- and that was a helluva book. What he's written for Shucked marries marvelously with its score -- and it's an exciting score with a lot of heart and humor. Hell, the entire piece is just so damn honest, it wears its heart on its sleeve. The show more than wants to give people a good time. It knows how to give people a good time. Everything is working together in tandem.
Being free from the strictures of adaptation may have something to do with it, but Horn, Clark, and McAnally are well matched and then some.
Second what clever2 says about the score. It feels like how the scores of the classic musical comedies did- the songs can be funny but aren’t typically constant deliveries for jokes, but rather for emotion and character. It balances the gag-a-second book well.
as for runtime, I would estimate 2:15 or so. The show started late due to the house opening late, but I was texting friends as I was exiting the theater by 10:37.
"...everyone finally shut up, and the audience could enjoy the beginning of the Anatevka Pogram in peace."
Alright. I guess I get to be the grinch, but this was super meh. I prefer to be respectable as possible, especially with a show still in early previews, so I’ll state that overall I had a mostly pleasant evening, but this was definitely not the show for me (strangely coming from someone who loves puns).
I didn’t see Tootsie, but can someone confirm whether or not that show also relied heavily on sexual innuendo and potty humor ? Based on the reactions of the section around me, I’m not sure how well this show is going to play for anyone older than millennials-ish (who for the most part we’re definitely enjoying the show). The boomers around me were …not as pleased.
I will say that much of the score was very tuneful and Alex Newell absolutely slays. The cast is very appealing and sings terrifically. But I also believe this type of show needs actors who are going to ham things up way over the top if they want to really sell this AIRPLANE!/Urinetown type humor, which is making me think of how hilarious Nancy Opel was as Miss Pennywise.
-There's the muddle in the middle. There's the puddle where the poodle did the piddle."
I cannot overstate how well the marketing for this is working. As we were lining up to get in the theater, a man pull over on a bike and started asking the workers if the show was that good, etc, and then asked if he could buy tickets for next week.
Two seconds later a random woman walking by asked if we were seeing “the corn musical” and then asked if it was created because of a TikTok, and after the show I saw 2 theater TikTok “stars” so I’ll be expecting them to post about it shortly.
Also, not sure if this is really notable but I found it odd. There were two audience plants in the show tonight (maybe plants isn’t the right word?) wearing shucked merch and employee lanyards. They didn’t do much besides clap at jokes that weren’t hitting, but they did try to start a standing O after Alex’s song (well deserved, but no one joined in).
Leaf Coneybear said: "Also, not sure if this is really notable but I found it odd. There were two audience plants in the show tonight (maybe plants isn’t the right word?) wearing shucked merch and employee lanyards. They didn’t do much besides clap at jokes that weren’t hitting, but they did try to start a standing O after Alex’s song (well deserved, but no one joined in)."
I’d bet a large sum of money that those were swings
Had a very good time tonight at Shucked. Laughed often and enjoyed the music. They did not include a song list so not sure of exact song titles but I really like Maybe Love, Walls and the two songs that Beau (Andrew Durand) sings. I would have preferred a bit more song and or tender moments vs. comedy. The jokes and one liners are nonstop so I did not catch everything but really laughed several times. Once I was crying from laughter so that is good and it’s been a while since that happened.
All the actors a quite good and it is a strong ensemble. I particularly liked the lighting, Andrew Durand and all the ballads. I definitely want to hear the music again and will revisit. This show made me think of Bright Star and on the way home said some novenas that Carmen Cusack gets back to Broadway soon.
ACL2006 said: "So we have this, Kimberly Akimbo & Some Like It Hot as locks for Tony nominations for Best Musical? What also could be the other two nominees? New York, New York? A Beautiful Noise? KPOP?"
I think “& Juliet” is very much secure to a nomination.
Also, we dont actually have to get 5 nominees, right? Or the expansion needs that?
I think Kimberly Akimbo, Some Like It Hot, & Juliet and Shuckled can be our nominees.
MadsonMelo said: "ACL2006 said: "So we have this, Kimberly Akimbo & Some Like It Hot as locks for Tony nominations for Best Musical? What also could be the other two nominees? New York, New York? A Beautiful Noise? KPOP?"
I think “& Juliet” is very much secure to a nomination.
Also, we dont actually have to get 5 nominees, right? Or the expansion needs that?
I think Kimberly Akimbo, Some Like It Hot, & Juliet and Shuckled can be our nominees."
Since there are 9 new musicals in contention this year, that means there will automatically be 5 Tony nominees for Best Musical.
I mean you can count out a show that audiences haven’t seen yet. NYNY might be amazing.
Also curious to see how this appeals to the standard Broadway audience or tourists. So far it seems all the young folk love it - and I love what I’ve heard and loved the book of Tootsie (maybe not so much the plot, which sounds like the case here too), so curious to hear more.
Well there's no doubt that they have cornered the market for people willing to spend $30 on a ticket this week. Also social media thirst traps who will do anything for $$$.
I just got a "very special" offer in my email this morning from The Public giving me "exclusive access" as a long time supporter to $300 tickets to Fat Ham.
The next few months will be very telling to see how well any of these new shows do at selling premium priced seats.
RippedMan said: "I mean you can count out a show that audiences haven’t seen yet. NYNY might be amazing.
Also curious to see how this appeals to the standard Broadway audience or tourists. So far it seems all the young folk love it - and I love what I’ve heard and loved the book of Tootsie (maybe not so much the plot, which sounds like the case here too), so curious to hear more."
As its a comedy, it might be a little hit and miss depending if audiences are fans of the comedic style. Its not filled with the Jewish humor that's staple of musical comedies. Instead its a mix of blue comedy, dad jokes, puns, one liners, sight gags, and vaudevillian routines, which should appeal to all audiences funny bones, but the blue comedy might take things a little too far for some. I think partially because the show is very wholesome unlike Book of Mormon, which constantly leans into the blue comedy and offend everyone humor, some older audiences might be offended by it.
Looking at the reddit thread the dissenting opinion took issue with a lot of the plot contrivances for a … MUSICAL COMEDY. It seems like those complaining are expecting a plot heavy farce, which Shucked is not, nor does it pretend to me. Now I am not saying the show is perfect, but for a musical comedy Horne's book it tight. Its a throwback to classic musical comedies, as instead of focusing on some wacky plot that will lead to hilarious hijinks, but also plot, Horne's book is much more focused on character dynamics and relationships. In all seriousness Horne's book basically stops focusing on and essentially wraps up the shows initial conflict/plot about 3/8's of the way through Act I to instead focus on character relationships.
Part of me wonders if this has to do with audiences becoming accustomed to stage adaptations of films. Film as a medium very much favors dynamic plots over character development compared to theater, so in the rise of stage adaptations of films audiences have started to expect the same from stage musicals?
I also love how they are starting to question if those who are giving it positive reviews are being paid/plants. If a small musical like Shucked hasthe money to pay audiences to like it, what's Bad Cinderella's excuse?
Yeah, I think that a secondary reason that the show has largely been coy about its plot is because, on paper, the plot isn't something that will get people to run out and buy tickets. It's pretty standard classic musical comedy fare.
For all its modern sensibility, the show is closer to something like Hello Dolly! than Book of Mormon. The plot is enough to form a compelling show out of, but it's predictable and full of tropes. Characters are archetypes, not richly realized portraits like Kimberly Akimbo or Strange Loop. It's a vehicle for songs and jokes and performances. And the show excels at those three things. You have to look at what a show is trying to do and grade it accordingly.
For me, it was refreshing to see a new, original show that really aimed for nothing more than to really entertain and make me laugh a lot- and did so with very few pop cultural references! There's a place for that on Broadway and it seems to have been diminished in favor of works of capital-I Importance or half-assed cash grabs.
"...everyone finally shut up, and the audience could enjoy the beginning of the Anatevka Pogram in peace."
Kad said: "Yeah, I think that a secondary reason that the show has largely been coy about its plot is because, on paper, the plot isn't something that will get people to run out and buy tickets. It's pretty standard classic musical comedy fare.
For all its modern sensibility, the show is closer to something like Hello Dolly! than Book of Mormon. The plot is enough to form a compelling show out of, but it's predictable and full of tropes. Characters are archetypes, not richly realized portraits like Kimberly Akimbo or Strange Loop. It's a vehicle for songs and jokes and performances. And the show excels at those three things. You have to look at what a show is trying to do and grade it accordingly.
I think this is the central reason I did not care for the show. As the plot is really superfluous and uninvolved, I didn't care about anything that happened to the characters at all. That left me with a few things to possibly cling on to: The music, performances, and any comedy. The music in many cases was really lovely, and it's performed and sung wonderfully (and frankly the best part of the show). However, the comedy fell flat in so many places for me, though, so that was a pretty fatal blow.
Curious to see how this one plays out if/when the younger crowd begins to fizzle out. I'm imagining this playing to an older crowd at a matinee in the future, and.... eek.
As everyone else has stated, however, their marketing campaign is absolutely brilliant and is doing a terrific job getting people talking about the show and in the building.
-There's the muddle in the middle. There's the puddle where the poodle did the piddle."
Kad said: "Book of Mormon’s humor is far cruder than anything in Shucked, and yet it managed to satisfy audiences across the country."
Partially expectations. I knew going into Book of Mormon exactly what type of comedy I was about to witness because of my experiences with South Park and Baseketball: crude, purposefully offensive, outlandish,and WILDLY hilarious (but also sometimes really stupid and not funny).
-There's the muddle in the middle. There's the puddle where the poodle did the piddle."
I think the past has shown that audiences aren’t really interested in predictable musicals. So curious to see how this fares. We’ve been spoiled with such complex shows like A Strange Loop and Fun Home that I’m not sure people will be willing to pay premium for a musical comedy. Book of Mormon had South Park as its angle. When was the last hit musical comedy that made its money back?