Jumpin_J said: "ErmengardeStopSniveling said: "ShowBro said: "Why the producers think this has equal to or more brand recognition than SLIH is a mystery to me. SLIH was a financial flop and this, without anystar power in the cast, is going to do what at the box office with its limited built in audience??"
Beats me. Feels like TOOTSIE 2.0.
It's going to have to appeal primarily to people who didn't watch the TV show, without alienating those who actually liked the TV show. Not an easy thing to do.
They might have been better off using the NEWSIES model of starting out of town with the intention of going straight to licensing. But everyone wants their show on Broadway and Robert Greenblatt (the lead producer along with Neil Meron)has been developing SMASH since before he was at NBC."
I think the Achilles heel is Stroman. If you want big, flashy, production numbers, she's hands down one of the best. But as a director, she's terrible. In the words of Janet Jackson, what have you done for me lately? She hasn't had a hit in over 20 years, and she inherited The Producers when her husband died. She has little sense of subtlety or how to tell a story. Anyone who saw New York, New York would know that. I wouldn't invest in this show with other people's money. I'm not rooting for it to flop, but on paper, this doesn't make sense."
I agree and wonder why producers chose her? She hasn't had a hit in years and she does the same old stuff nothing new or fresh. Look what she did last time around and that sucked - New York, New York!
"Anything you do, let it it come from you--then it will be new."
Sunday in the Park with George