Posted: 5/27/15 at 4:13pm
Of course, it is merely his opinion that Kelli is just "poised and fully capable in The King and I, and sings with lovely clarity. It is an admirably classy performance, but not an especially exciting one".
I for one found her take on Anna to be invigorating and much more imbued with passion than past Anna's I've seen. I also wasn't as moved by Cheno as most were. I found her to be doing her typical schtick. Just because she's finally in a show that calls for that schtick doesn't mean she's doing anything extraordinary. If that were the correct logic all the time, Cheno would have won for Wicked, Bernadette would have been nominated and won for Follies, and Laura Osnes would have won for Cinderella. Just because you are the right type for a role doesn't mean that you do anything outside of your comfort zone to make you particularly noteworthy.
Now before everyone fires back with "but that's exactly what Kelli is doing in The King and I... her usual schtick, etc....", I would argue that she doesn't have a usual schtick unless you count singing melodically and embodying a character as schtick. To me, Kelli is acting. Kristin, on the other hand, is playing Kristin. But hey, that's just my opinion, and everyone is obviously entitled to one of their own.