Really fascinating race and two incredible performers. The general impression from this board and most critics seemed to be that Metcalf had this locked, making Linney's Drama Desk and Outer Critics wins are both surprising. Also interesting as both are on their 4th nominations. Thoughts on who will win? Also sorry if this feels like yet another tony thread-this seemed like such a specific thing to discuss, that I thought it might warrant its own thread.
It's a tough call. I thought both gave excellent performances, and both are overdue for a Tony. If I had to pick though, I think I'd pick Linney, mainly because I think she has better material to work with. I think Regina is far more interesting and 3-dimensional than Hnath's version of Nora, and Little Foxes is significantly more well-written. For me, Metcalf elevated the material and demonstrated her excellent acting chops, while Linney disappeared more fully into the role. I personally prefer the latter.
Either could win, but in my head I can't justify anyone but Metcalf winning. I've seen everyone in that category except Blanchett, and her work has stuck with me the most.
I am a firm believer in serendipity- all the random pieces coming together in one wonderful moment, when suddenly you see what their purpose was all along.
I just saw both on Friday (Linney) and Saturday (Metcalf). I have to admit that I don't get all the raves for Metcalf, a performer who I like. I thought she was excellent, but i didn't feel she was playing a full-blooded character. I know a lot of people on this board loved ADH2; to me, it was entertaining, but it seemed more like an outline for a play rather than a full play. The points raised were very interesting and thoughtful, but that didn't make it a play...at least for me. And that impacted my view of Metcalfe's performance.
On the other hand, I thought Linney gave a remarkable performance as Regina (and Birdie, for that matter). She played a full-blooded character and, for me at least, made Bette Davis's performance seem almost one-dimensional.
I will really be disappointed if Linney does not win, as I think it may be the best performance I have seen her give to date in any medium.
Both are doing excellent and exciting work, such different plays and performances though. Metcalf gets my vote, what a tour de force! But Linney is a commendable choice. I still expect the Tony to go to Metcalf.
"Some people can thrive and bloom living life in a living room, that's perfect for some people of one hundred and five. But I at least gotta try, when I think of all the sights that I gotta see, all the places I gotta play, all the things that I gotta be at"
I'm still predicting Metcalf, but in my ideal world, they would tie. These are two of my favorite actresses, and neither has ever won a Tony (which is criminal).
Still believe Blanchett gave the best performance of the season.
That said, I would vote Linney over Metcalf. Regina is a far more interesting and complex character. She's also giving this performance while alternating roles, which is insane.
10086sunset said: "Still believe Blanchett gave the best performance of the season.
That said, I would vote Linney over Metcalf. Regina is a far more interesting and complex character. She's also giving this performance while alternating roles, which is insane."
The alternating roles aspect is important to remember. Even though the voters are supposed to be basing their vote on her work as Regina, there will definitely be some who have this in the back of their mind and it could easily influence their choice, whether consciously or not. Let's face it, even here on this board we have many people who speak about the awards not in terms of the quality of the performance but in how hard an actor is working. "Such and Such an actor never leaves the stage and thus deserves the award for working so hard" or "So and so only has two big solos, while Such and Such has four and is the center-point of several big ensemble pieces, so Such and Such should get the award" are not unheard of sentiments around here.
Does anyone think Metcalf being in Three Tall Women next year gives Linney an advantage? Would voters maybe hold off so they can reward Metcalf next year and give Linney the win this year?
The more likely scenario is Tony voters will want to reward both Laura Linney and Cynthia Nixon. So if we're to assume Nixon is a lock for featured actress, then I think Linney would have the edge over Metcalf.
Saw 'em both, loved 'em both, I'd vote for Metcalf (even though I'm a bigger fan of Linney, whose double-role, I agree, could favor into the voting of some). To me, Linney's is an excellent interpretation, whereas Metcalf's is one of those take-no-prisoners performances that becomes legendary.
If there was ever a category worthy of a tie this year, this would be the one. They are both giving extraordinary performances this season in their own rights. I might personally give Linney the edge by 0.00001%, but I wish they could both be equally recognized for their incredible work on Sunday night.
I loved both performances and would be so happy if either of them one, but I think I'm pulling a little more for Linney. What has stuck with me since seeing The Little Foxes a few weeks ago was the subtle movement she made to sit back in her chair when Horace was dying. That one small movement made such a HUGE impact on me.
When I see the phrase "the ____ estate", I imagine a vast mansion in the country full of monocled men and high-collared women receiving letters about productions across the country and doing spit-takes at whatever they contain.
-Kad
I just don't think Metcalf's role was nearly as complex as Linney's. I felt occasionally that she was not playing a real character (think A Doll's House by Ibsen), just a lot of ideas, whereas Regina was a real character and Linney brought so much to the role. I expect Metcalfe to win (surprise hit, midnight performance), but really don't think it will be deserved.
givesmevoice said: "I loved both performances and would be so happy if either of them one, but I think I'm pulling a little more for Linney. What has stuck with me since seeing The Little Foxes a few weeks ago was the subtle movement she made to sit back in her chair when Horace was dying. That one small movement made such a HUGE impact on me."
See, this is what I was missing from Linney's performance. Maybe I was just too far back, but it felt like a mostly surface portrayal of the character. It's a good performance, but it didn't really strike me as...surprising, if that makes sense? It was all the technical elements of Regina, but something was just lacking for me.
I am a firm believer in serendipity- all the random pieces coming together in one wonderful moment, when suddenly you see what their purpose was all along.
wonderfulwizard11 said: "givesmevoice said: "I loved both performances and would be so happy if either of them one, but I think I'm pulling a little more for Linney. What has stuck with me since seeing The Little Foxes a few weeks ago was the subtle movement she made to sit back in her chair when Horace was dying. That one small movement made such a HUGE impact on me."
See, this is what I was missing from Linney's performance. Maybe I was just too far back, but it felt like a mostly surface portrayal of the character. It's a good performance, but it didn't really strike me as...surprising, if that makes sense? It was all the technical elements of Regina, but something was just lacking for me."
For what it's worth, I was sitting in the last row of the mezzanine, and I agree with givesmevoice. I found her Regina to be fascinating and fully fleshed out. Maybe you saw her on an off day? Or maybe her take on the role was just not to your liking, which is fine too. To each their own!
I think both are exceptional performances. However, I feel Metcalf deserves it more. Nora is a tour de force character with ups and downs.Its physical, its sad, its hysterical and vulnerable and its a showcase for Metcalf. It's a very modern play with modern sensibilities so you can't compare it to Foxes. Apples and oranges.
Linney is marvelous but after her failure in Liaisons, this is a nice redemption but she has plenty more time to win a Tony. We all know politics are involved and Metcalf was woefully overlooked for The Other Place as well as many other performances. Its her time.
"The sexual energy between the mother and son really concerns me!"-random woman behind me at Next to Normal
"I want to meet him after and bang him!"-random woman who exposed her breasts at Rock of Ages, referring to James Carpinello
I think Laurie Metcalf was far more natural as Nora than Laura Linney as Regina, and, for this reason, she would get my vote. The modern vernacular in A DOLL'S HOUSE, PART 2 certainly played a part in the ease of Ms. Metcalf's delivery, but of the three nominated performances from THE LITTLE FOXES, Ms. Linney's was the weakest, in my opinion. Granted, Cynthia Nixon and Richard Thomas had featured roles, as opposed to Ms. Linney's lead, but I felt they inhabited their characters more seamlessly, as did Ms. Metcalf. For me, Ms. Linney never quite disappeared into Regina, and her dialogue felt somewhat forced. Don't get me wrong, I enjoyed the performance, but I don't believe it deserves a Tony.