Into the Woods Official Movie Thread — Page 160

#3976

Official Into the Woods Movie Discussion Thread

Posted: 12/17/14 at 11:06am

God I wish the hive-mind/gestapo at this board had relented and allowed an "ITW reviews" thread... Reviews and a score just now appearing on RottenTomatoes today and we're already on page 160 here.

Updated On: 12/17/14 at 11:06 AM

#3977

Official Into the Woods Movie Discussion Thread

Posted: 12/17/14 at 11:07am

Well, the thread is now discussing reviews, so I don't really... understand the criticism there.

---

"...everyone finally shut up, and the audience could enjoy the beginning of the Anatevka Pogram in peace."

#3978

Official Into the Woods Movie Discussion Thread

Posted: 12/17/14 at 11:10am

---

CHURCH DOOR TOUCAN GAY MARKETING PUPPIES MUSICAL THEATER STAPLES PERIOD OIL BITCHY SNARK HOLES

#3979

Official Into the Woods Movie Discussion Thread

Posted: 12/17/14 at 11:14am

I would rather we keep things that has to do with the film in here anyway.

#3980

Official Into the Woods Movie Discussion Thread

Posted: 12/17/14 at 11:15am

Jordan.. PEACE!

Updated On: 12/17/14 at 11:15 AM

#3981

Official Into the Woods Movie Discussion Thread

Posted: 12/17/14 at 11:18am

Corine your link is titled Go Into The WORDS. Was that intentional?

#3982

Official Into the Woods Movie Discussion Thread

Posted: 12/17/14 at 11:19am

"Well, the thread is now discussing reviews, so I don't really... understand the criticism there."

Most big-news shows have had separate review threads, detached from the rumor threads and casting threads, etc. And no matter how the title gets changed along the way, it still says "Into the Woods Movie Cast" on the main board page. Plus 160 pages/almost 4k posts is a LOT of content to scroll through to see just one aspect of the film: reviews.

What's wrong with compartmentalizing threads? BWW isn't gonna run out of hard drive space.

Updated On: 12/17/14 at 11:19 AM

#3983

Official Into the Woods Movie Discussion Thread

Posted: 12/17/14 at 11:19am

You first, Corine. I'll get you a free ticket up to a cliff (since that's the only way you'd ever go to one) and you can hobble off of it.

Updated On: 12/17/14 at 11:19 AM

#3984

Official Into the Woods Movie Discussion Thread

Posted: 12/17/14 at 11:23am

The "Go Into the Woods" site really needs an editor... and I was "huh?" with: "Some of the changes included no sexual relations with the big bad wolf played by Johnny Depp."

Don't remember ANY production where Red has "sexual relations" with the wolf... yikes.

#3985

Official Into the Woods Movie Discussion Thread

Posted: 12/17/14 at 11:27am

Searching for anything resembling "journalism" in a Corine review is like trying to find meaning in a Pauly Shore movie.

#3986

Official Into the Woods Movie Discussion Thread

Posted: 12/17/14 at 11:28am

I wanted to answer but Jordan's avatar has me hypnotized...

#3987

Official Into the Woods Movie Discussion Thread

Posted: 12/17/14 at 11:29am

Google him and be hypnotized all day long...

#3988

Official Into the Woods Movie Discussion Thread

Posted: 12/17/14 at 11:34am

"Don't remember ANY production where Red has "sexual relations" with the wolf... yikes."

There's a strong sexual subtext. The innuendo was taken to new heights at Shakespeare in the Park, with more than a suggestion of Wolf's eating Red going, yes, there! Many here on bww were not at all amused!

By all accounts, the erotic tensions between Red and Wolf have been turned down big time in the movie, which, given that Lilla Crawford, an actual little girl is playing Red, seems an unimpeachable choice (or perhaps impeachable only if one also complains about the casting of an actual child).

Updated On: 12/17/14 at 11:34 AM

#3989

Official Into the Woods Movie Discussion Thread

Posted: 12/17/14 at 11:41am

There was no denying the penis in the original production. However you interpret it, either literally, or figuratively, LRRH is changed from naive to experienced. She "knows things now" and I don't think it's just the inside of the Wolf.

#3990

Official Into the Woods Movie Discussion Thread

Posted: 12/17/14 at 11:44am

I've seen the PBS video obviously, and several other productions live... There's always subtext and innuendo, but "has sexual relations" is a ompletely different thing.

Saw the movie Monday; minus the furry penis from the original production, there's still a bit of pervy innuendo. The kids' roles are made more touching being played by actual kids, but it also reduces how "unsubtle" you can be. Still works.

#3991

Official Into the Woods Movie Discussion Thread

Posted: 12/17/14 at 11:45am

This line in the Hollywood Reporter review:

"Billy Magnussen is equally good as the Prince's younger brother, blinded by love for Rapunzel. "

I see what they did there.

#3992

Official Into the Woods Movie Discussion Thread

Posted: 12/17/14 at 1:44pm

Yes. It is a number from Forbidden Broadway. It was intentional.
I remember the furry penis as well. I meant sexual subtext but took that out.

Updated On: 12/17/14 at 01:44 PM

#3993

Official Into the Woods Movie Discussion Thread

Posted: 12/17/14 at 1:53pm

I too would've loved a separate thread for the reviews, but sometimes you just gotta deal.

#3994

Official Into the Woods Movie Discussion Thread

Posted: 12/17/14 at 2:00pm

I wish there was a separate thread for the separatists in this thread.

---

"Jaws is the Citizen Kane of movies."

---

blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22

#3995

Official Into the Woods Movie Discussion Thread

Posted: 12/17/14 at 2:10pm

You could always start an independent thread yourself, jpbran.

It may be a little awkward now, but in the mists of time, anybody searching for info on the movie will be grateful it's all on one thread, especially with the search function the way it is.

Or maybe not. 160 pages is a lot to wade through, admittedly.

---

Beyoncé is not an ally. Actions speak louder than words, Mrs. Carter. #Dubai #$$$

Updated On: 12/17/14 at 02:10 PM

#3996

Official Into the Woods Movie Discussion Thread

Posted: 12/17/14 at 2:21pm

Well, growl had started a separatists thread. But anyway, Rotten Tomatoes has a 78% for early reviews, that's not bad considering Rob Marshall's previous films after CHICAGO.

#3997

Official Into the Woods Movie Discussion Thread

Posted: 12/17/14 at 2:26pm

Anything above 70% is pretty damn good on Rotten Tomatoes.

#3998

Official Into the Woods Movie Discussion Thread

Posted: 12/17/14 at 2:43pm

vanity fair seems like the worst review so far. It reads mixed to negative.

#3999

Official Into the Woods Movie Discussion Thread

Posted: 12/17/14 at 2:53pm

When did Vanity Fair do film reviews? That's a bit strange that one of the top fashion magazines in the US writes to do such a thing. Ah well, the majority so far is still positive.

#4000

Official Into the Woods Movie Discussion Thread

Posted: 12/17/14 at 3:18pm

I am so glad that my baby daddy is getting such good notices for his preening, singing...and especially ripping off his shirt. All things he thoroughly excels at!