The show is not a period piece and works well today. Maybe even better. It has stood the test of time and you will notice small details in this production to bring it to 2024, including subtle staging in ‘light’ to make it clear what Diana’s choices are. The only thing that might be considered period is the music. It is what it is and I love it. Does anyone want to see a pasek & Paul bubble gum version or a Lin Manuel rapped version of next to normal? I like that the sound is a little rough in aesthetic, putting us in a very post rent inspired but not quite yet pasek & Paul pop sound yet. If it were done today I think it would be too polished, too clean. The score is a little wild and I love that because it kind of keeps you on edge.
"You can't overrate Bernadette Peters. She is such a genius. There's a moment in "Too Many Mornings" and Bernadette doing 'I wore green the last time' - It's a voice that is just already given up - it is so sorrowful. Tragic. You can see from that moment the show is going to be headed into such dark territory and it hinges on this tiny throwaway moment of the voice." - Ben Brantley (2022)
"Bernadette's whole, stunning performance [as Rose in Gypsy] galvanized the actors capable of letting loose with her. Bernadette's Rose did take its rightful place, but too late, and unseen by too many who should have seen it" Arthur Laurents (2009)
"Sondheim's own favorite star performances? [Bernadette] Peters in ''Sunday in the Park,'' Lansbury in ''Sweeney Todd'' and ''obviously, Ethel was thrilling in 'Gypsy.'' Nytimes, 2000
Could definitely be me reading into it too much but in several recent interviews where Jack Wolfe has been asked about his future acting plans he's always replied something along the lines of that he's "clinging on to Next to Normal for as long as he can", which to me implies that there's definitely conversations happening somewhere about him going over with it.
Caissie Levy's obviously a definite, but as much as I love Eleanor Worthington-Cox and Jamie Parker I'd assume that it'd be quite a fight to get three British actors across for one production that already has a small cast. I have no idea how likely it'd be but I just really hope that casting directors don't subscribe to some fans romantic notion of getting Aaron Tveit back to play Dan - I don't think he's right for the role at all, especially after seeing Parker's incredible interpretation.
There’s no point in transferring this production anywhere without Jamie Parker. His performance is just as strong as Levy’s and for me, one of the best male performances I’ve ever seen in a musical. And I mean EVER.
infinitefoxes said: "Could definitely be me reading into it too much but in several recent interviews where Jack Wolfe has been asked about his future acting plans he's always replied something along the lines of that he's "clinging on to Next to Normal for as long as he can", which to me implies that there's definitely conversations happening somewhere about him going over with it.
Caissie Levy's obviously a definite, but as much as I loveEleanor Worthington-Cox and Jamie Parker I'd assume that it'd be quite a fight to get three British actors across for one production that already has a small cast. I have no idea how likely it'd be but I just reallyhope that casting directorsdon't subscribe to some fans romantic notion of getting Aaron Tveit back to play Dan - I don't think he's right for the role at all, especially after seeing Parker's incredible interpretation."
I mean, they’ve brought the entire British company of the …GOES WRONG series twice and also are working on getting MINCEMEAT with the 5 originals over here soon (ideally for 2025 - talks are ongoing).
I could see them coming over and then some of them leave after a limited run. Jack Ofrecio could easily be recast, as could (despite him being absolutely magnetic) Trevor Dion Nicholas. But the three Olivier nominated stars and “Tony Nominee Jamie Parker” make a good case to transfer
Check out my eBay page for sales on Playbills!!
www.ebay.com/usr/missvirginiahamm
Jordan Catalano said: "There’s no point in transferring this production anywherewithout Jamie Parker. His performance is just as strong as Levy’s and for me, one of the best male performances I’ve ever seen in a musical. And I mean EVER."
PREACH!!
Jamie Parker has done 2 shows on Broadway and is a Tony Award nominee for Best Actor in a Play. There's no way he wouldnt be allowed to go if it actually does transfer.
I did find Jamie Parker's accent choice distracting, although his acting was great. Ofrecio similar could've used some more time with a dialect coach. I think some shaky American accents are understandable in London, but they'd need to fix them up for New York. On the other hand, Wolfe and Worthington Cox were flawless to my American ears.
I find the piece very engrained in 2008. I find the way characters communicate to be very 2000s playwright that hadn’t aged particularly well in my eyes. Sorry yall don’t agree! Im glad you liked it, so did I!
infinitefoxes said: "Jordan Catalano said: "Whereas I’ve been told one of them is very attached to another show possibly coming to Broadway next Spring."
You’re presumably talking about Levy given that the rest of them all work in the UK?"
yes, Levy is attached to the encores transfer of Ragtime
I don’t think there’s any theatres left honestly. A transfer of Ragtime would hinge on the success of the show, which won’t be known until November. And with so many other things waiting in the wings ready to go, including Dead outlaw, operation mincemeat, smash, motive and the cue, stranger things, gun&powder, hippest trip, frank Sinatra, I doubt Ragtime goes to the front of the line. Why would they even cast her if she was already attached to another show? My feeling is Next to Normal comes in. And Ragtime maybe next fall
The next to normal west end sales are a bit slow right now. I wonder if this will affect chances of cast recording, transfer etc. we desperately need this recording on disc!
"You can't overrate Bernadette Peters. She is such a genius. There's a moment in "Too Many Mornings" and Bernadette doing 'I wore green the last time' - It's a voice that is just already given up - it is so sorrowful. Tragic. You can see from that moment the show is going to be headed into such dark territory and it hinges on this tiny throwaway moment of the voice." - Ben Brantley (2022)
"Bernadette's whole, stunning performance [as Rose in Gypsy] galvanized the actors capable of letting loose with her. Bernadette's Rose did take its rightful place, but too late, and unseen by too many who should have seen it" Arthur Laurents (2009)
"Sondheim's own favorite star performances? [Bernadette] Peters in ''Sunday in the Park,'' Lansbury in ''Sweeney Todd'' and ''obviously, Ethel was thrilling in 'Gypsy.'' Nytimes, 2000
binau said: "The next to normal west end sales are a bit slow right now.I wonder if this will affect chances of cast recording, transfer etc. we desperately need this recording on disc!"
Here’s hoping it transfers and with Caissie. Regardless, we must get a cast recording from this production asap. Is it true it’s cheaper to produce cast recordings (I know pro shots are cheaper) in London?
I saw this production earlier this week and I loved it. For me (and I guess I am an outlier here) was Jamie Parker. His singing was the weakest of the bunch for me. He still acted amazingly but in a show that has strong singing, he seemed to struggle with the material a bit, especially the higher stuff.
Nonetheless, terrific production, terrific cast and performances. Easily the best thing I've seen in London this week.
I didn’t realize what a musical person he is. I thought he was a serious English Shakespearean dramatic actor. I only knew him from Harry Potter but he’s done many musicals and concerts and plays the piano. He’s also on the Sierra boggess Oklahoma! recording as will Parker.
Seeing the show a few times the week of August 19th and I can't wait to see how everyone has grown since the Donmar last year. Caissie Levy's Diana sits easily in my top 5 musical theatre performances, comfortably next to Alice Ripley's. Personally speaking, I was diagnosed with bipolar 1 several years after becoming a fan of next to normal and seeing the 1NT/a few regional productions. While I related to the show from a teenage angst lens back in 2009/2010, I now see a lot of my own struggles with the diagnosis and what has led me to be stable with meds/therapy. Subtle changes were needed to emphasize the importance that Diana continue to explore meds options, so I really appreciated that. Even before I was diagnosed, I took issue with Diana kind of going off the grid (?) in the OG staging. However, I do think that the show's intentions have always been very well meaning and the story provides a very honest depiction of mental illness/grief.