Someone took and leaked nude photos at Take Me Out

It's absolutely disgusting.

I would guess it's practically impossible. Sigh. Or not not worth the effort in the eyes of those with the say-so.



They could have had a borrowed or second cell - it would be that hard to slip a second phone through. And ushers would be less likely to be on the lookout (for the few that ever are) for one.

Horrible to hear about, though.

I’m curious if Williams was aware of the leak by the time he got on Watch What Happens Live that same day. He talked about nudity and said, “Everybody makes such a big deal. It’s a body. Once you see it, you realize, whatever, it’s a body!”

They don’t tape WWHL live anymore, so he had probably been there earlier in the day or another day entirely.

Tom5 said: "...all actors should be forever advised never to appear unclothed on stage unless they are prepared for that image to appear on the internet in perpetuity."

I feel pretty sure all of the actors who appear nude in this show were/are aware of the inevitability that their image(s) would appear on the internet at some point. It would be extremely naive to think anything else.

I also think that the statement, "It’s a body. Once you see it, you realize, whatever, it’s a body!” is a mentally/socially healthy attitude, but basically untrue. It's not just any body... it's *his* body, and one he obviously takes care to enhance its attractiveness (genetic endowments aside). Also, I think it would be just as naive to mask the fact that at least part of the reason he was cast in this role is *because* of his attractive body.

I don't share the outrage some have expressed. Why would I be outraged by such an obviously inevitable event?

That said, I'm grateful for the responses/actions effected that provide as much control over the situation, and protect the actors as much as can be reasonably expected. I also believe that these actors are mature enough to understand the risk(s) of performing nude, given an understanding of 21st century technology.

If the actors can feel as reasonably safe/protected as meets their comfortability level, and those who are charged with keeping the situation under control do *their* jobs to the best of their abilities, there's not much more to be said.

This was my first theatrical experience that used Yondr, so I don't know if they have a different policy, but based on the comedy shows I've been to you wouldn't even have to come up with a second phone - you can just tell the Yondr attendant that you didn't bring it. In my case I have just left it in the car before to avoid an extra step on the way in and out, but it would be super easy to lie.

I wear knee-high compression socks and they've served as an excellent place to store my passport, wallet and other small items when I travel. I could easily tuck a phone or camera in there and walk into a theater undetected.

That said, I don't approve of what this person did.

BroadwayGirl107 said: "Kad said: "I hope everyone who is outraged is also outraged about bootlegs in general, because it’s the exact same principle."

The theater goes out of their way to lock up people’s phones for this show. One would assume the agreement of the actors to appear nude was contingent upon this extra security measure. Appearing nude onstage is inherently more vulnerable, and this is about a much more egregious breach of bodily consent, so no….I don’t believe this is the same issue at all."

It’s photo / video taken without the consent of those appearing onstage, against the explicitly stated rules of the theater, and against the law, is it not? The fact there was extra security to enforce those already existing rules is beside the point.

Kad said: "BroadwayGirl107 said: "Kad said: "I hope everyone who is outraged is also outraged about bootlegs in general, because it’s the exact same principle."

The theater goes out of their way to lock up people’s phones for this show. One would assume the agreement of the actors to appear nude was contingent upon this extra security measure. Appearing nude onstage is inherently more vulnerable, and this is about a much more egregious breach of bodily consent, so no….I don’t believe this is the same issue at all."

It’s photo / video taken without the consent of those appearing onstage, against the explicitly stated rules of the theater, and against the law, is it not? The fact there was extra security to enforce those already existing rulesis beside the point.
"

I genuinely can’t tell if you’re being intentionally obtuse or not here, but I’ll assume your sincerity for a moment. The issue of most bootlegs is less about consent and more about how that art is being distributed without the proper compensation for the artists who put in the work—much like any video of their work would require licensing. Most artists would be thrilled for more people to see their work shared( properly recorded of course) and reach a wider audience. This is why there is always a debate around bootlegs, as some bootlegs of great performances actually bolster the reputation of the show or performer—the issue is they are. It compensated for their creation.



This is video completely out of context taken 100% for the sharing of the nude body of the person it captures. It goes beyond the realm of exploiting the labor of the artists but again, the consent of their bodies.

I am being 100% sincere because I think, frankly, this is a lot of performative outrage and hypocrisy. These are not nudes sent in confidence from one individual to another. This is not an intimate setting between Williams and a partner. This is a Broadway production being seen by thousands of people in 2022. Discussing this in terms that until recently were reserved for things such as revenge porn is obfuscating the point and, ironically, has shades of a puritanical view of the human body.

At the end of the day, it doesn’t matter whether someone is nude onstage or not (and there has been plenty, plenty of nudity of onstage): the rules are the same. If the producers of Funny Girl had decided to have audiences lock up their phones so Beanie’s vocals didn’t leak out, would people be as accommodating? Would they be as outraged when it is inevitably breached? Most likely not.


If the idea is that theater stays between the performers and the audience, in the performance, as an ephemeral thing, then it needs to be consistent, not convenient.

It's horrible and a huge violation. Even if an actor is comfortable in their skin, it's not ok for someone to use their naked image without their consent. I hope the source is caught and prosecuted.

I will agree that in today's world the only guarantee of not having on stage nudes leaked is to not perform nude. I caught a woman filming Moulin Rouge in HD from a camera in her hair bun. She bolted from the theatre before she could be addressed.

It's interesting that Equity is taking the time to address this. Are they only addressing it because of the Yondr pouches, because there are nude bootlegs from shows all over the internet. Why were they not issuing statements for The Little Dog Laughed Cast, Mike Doyle, Audra, etc? They have proven how toothless they are throughout the pandemic so I don't imagine they will address this in any effective way. Issuing a statement that they condemn this. Who wouldn't condemn this? Groundbreaking AEA.

I actually tried to avoid it on Twitter, but their algorithms thought otherwise. While I'll admit I was curious, I feel so bad that this leaked and angry that this person captured such intimacy. If anything, hopefully this will enforce stronger rules, even more Yondr pouches, on Broadway.