Yeah I was just going to say...that block of 42nd Street isn't in need of revitalization. This IS the revitalization.
Some of us might not enjoy the throngs of tourists, and tacky merch stores (myself included) - but that was all done on purpose by the city. It's lurid, ugly, and crowded, but it's not dangerous, or run down. And it's a place for tourists to go spend money which, as we know, is a big part of our city's economy.
As for a new theatre: as always when discussing this topic, we have to consider that a project like this would be an immense financial undertaking and risk. This is true of restoring any theatre, let alone building one - does the structure of the that theatre interior even still exist? (I know it does for some other spaces in that area - the Empire, the Liberty, the one at John's Pizzaria, etc.). (EDIT: the user above answered this question while I was typing this post - thanks!)
But aside from that, I don't agree that the location would be a major obstacle. There's a crap-load of foot traffic there, for one thing.
You say that the New Amsterdam gets "lost" but like, does it really? Sure, it doesn't have a beautiful, ornate, historical facade. And yes it can blend in with all the lights and noise. But thousands of tourists find their way to the New Amsterdam every week, just fine.
And in this age of advertising, I doubt most shows are living and dying based on how visible their marquis is: most people will buy tickets before ever laying eyes on the theatre, and they'll use their phones to locate it if the marquis doesn't stand out enough.
Updated On: 8/1/22 at 10:01 AM