Posted: 7/9/22 at 6:37pm
Returning to my BWW account just to talk about this! I saw the matinee today. I'm a huge fan of 1776 -- my mom saw the original Broadway production and the first tour (when it was in Boston, in fact), and so introduced me to the movie when I was a kid. I've seen a few productions over the years, including the Encores with Santino a few years back when I was still in NYC. So I came in with high familiarity. I was also pretty excited for the whole concept and the casting conceit; we've had tons of traditional productions of 1776, so I think exploring it in a nontraditional way is a nice idea.
Overall? I came out feeling good about the experience, but it's definitely a mixed bag. A lot of my negative feelings, others have touched on. Some of the actors are playing their roles very traditional and colonial, some are playing a lot more modern, and the inconsistency there can be jarring. I noted that a few of the actors just read so damn young; Wilson in particular stood out to me as reading in his 20s and just really youthful. And some of the actors had what I kind of think of as -- wandering feet? That sense of moving without firm intention. It's one of those things that stands out to me in terms of an actor having a strong presence on stage or not.
One of the other biggest bothers of the production is another thing others have mentioned: the amount of lines that are directed out at the audience, to such an extreme that it honestly felt like mugging. It made it really feel like the production didn't trust the audience to get it. Like, you already have the visual of these lines coming from women, nonbinary people, people of color, etc., which can have a great impact, and you can even use some particular emphasis sparingly to make things stand out -- but in this, there were just too many instances of the actors looking pointedly at the audience like "GET IT?!"
The direction for Martha and "He Plays The Violin" read very odd to me. It really felt like she hated Adams and Franklin? I wasn't sure if it was trying to make a point about them being the men responsible for keeping Thomas away from her or not, it was just too unclear. And then the sexualization of the number was, uh. A whole lot. I mean, the song can already have an innuendo to it, but I think someone in the thread mentioned "When Harry Met Sally" and it's a pretty apt comparison. But the actress herself did really well, and her voice was fantastic.
Another criticism is that there were so many moments that felt rushed to me. Like it felt like they never gave the lines any room to breathe. Which is too bad, because it's such a strong book.
That said, Joanna Glushak as Dickinson is a huge standout. She had such poise and presence on stage. A+. I think Sara Porkalob as Rutledge was a little over the top at times, but "Molasses to Rum" absolutely hits hard and she did fantastic work with it. And it's a moment where the casting works the most effectively. It doesn't try to mug pointedly to the audience, but builds the number in a way that felt a lot more organic and earned.
There's two revisions/additions that are called out in the program itself:
The first I did notice, the lines stood out to me because I couldn't recall having heard them in the show before, but it wasn't until I read the program that I confirmed it was new. It did feel a little off just because -- well, by the nature of its insertion, John's reply in the script doesn't really address this whole other thing she's saying.
The latter I didn't notice at all. Like, I noticed that there was a servant, and I could tell the servant was being emphasized, but I had no context and couldn't understand the importance. A bit weird.
They have some interesting musical arrangements for a few of the numbers that offer some fresh takes. Overall I tended to enjoy them.
There's my hot take, anyways!