Posted: 2/3/23 at 11:43am
JudyDenmark said: "Gender is a relevant social construct to the people who have been fighting for women’s rights for decades/centuries. I fight for LGBT rights too, but the existence and rights of non-binary people doesn’t and shouldn’t erase binary people (cis or trans).”
I agree, but philosophically, one can’t simultaneously argue that gender is a social construct that should be abolished AND separate people by gender categories.
Obviously, biologically speaking, we have men, we have women, and rarely, we have people who are intersex. All of this should be pretty unimportant except when it comes to procreation and things like that, but human beings have a tendency to make it much more important than it needs to be - gender roles, gender presentation, etc. This has now come to a head where this social construct of gender (based on biological sex) is being deconstructed in a number of ways. This has resulted in people who both view the world and define themselves and others almost entirely by their gender, as well as those who take the opposite approach and try to take a “gender-blind” approach. I’m not going to make an argument for either, but I do feel that by spending so much time thinking about this stuff, one can be like a dog chasing its own tail. So when it comes to acting awards, which can never be voted on objectively anyway, the best solution I think is to attempt to take both approaches simultaneously by eliminating gender from the titles of the categories while still keeping inclusivity in mind while voting.