missthemountains said: "I'm just wondering if reviving this story with an all-Black cast is productive. I'm so, so, so for "non traditional" and "inclusive" casting. But I think by retelling the story of Gypsy Rose Lee, a real person who was white, with a Black body, we get into erasure territory. Things were so insanely segregated back then. I mean, Black face was a form of entertainment in that period of time. Black performers certainly did break through, but it was far and few in between. Even Carol Channing hid the fact she was biracial until close to her own death.
However, it's not like there weren't EVER Black women who weren't like GRL--but at that point, it's a different story. I wasn't born off a turnip truck, I know that a story similar but with a Black woman would be an original work, original stuff doesn't sell, blah, blah, blah. I just think no matter how you cut it, if you're doing a piece based off a real person/public figure where the actor playing them is of a different race than the real person, it becomes a different story. And there's totally nothing wrong with that! It's just like, at that point, lean into that. Take the pieces of the figure you want to tell the story about and create something new!
I just think we're past the point of "colorblind" and this doesn't feel color-conscious to me, unless you'd make changes, and at that point, it's like...the show is 60 years old and none of the authors are alive. Just do something else. Especially this story. There have been so, so, many revivals of it. This and ITW are criminally overdone professionally."
Good grief, suspend your disbelief a little. Haven’t you people ever heard of the THEATRE?! God forbid a six-time-Tony-winning actress play Mama Rose because she’s black and the authors of the show are dead.
Oy vey!