I think the entire production will be just a grand exercise. No doubt some things will be re-written, other things will stay the same (and work or not) but I don't think this is going to become the basis of a new version we see often performed.
Not to throw any skepticism into the mix, but Marianne Elliott (whose dramatic work I love) is relatively inexperienced with musicals. She directed The Light Princess but it wasn't near the level of her greatest dramatic achievements.
“I knew who I was this morning, but I've changed a few times since then.”
Elliot commented that Stephen Sondheim "didn’t like the idea at first, but he agreed to let me workshop it in London. We filmed part of it and sent it to him in New York, and he said he loved it. He has agreed to the odd lyric change, but essentially I’m hoping to tweak it as little as possible. Reviving Company 47 years on, I think it actually makes more sense for Bobby to be a woman."
“I knew who I was this morning, but I've changed a few times since then.”
Will hold out on actual judgement for when this starts as well as seeing how it grows as a show, but although I support gender-swapping male main characters because it always opens up fun new female roles that are hardly ever written, god when things are changed around them to make sure it remains a straight-friendly story it makes my skin crawl. So much effort just to keep media straight is... Exhausting.
Looks like they had some sort of launch for the production while Patti was in London. Here's a clip of Rosalie Craig singing "Being Alive" - she sounds incredible.
"Oh look at the time, three more intelligent plays just closed and THE ADDAMS FAMILY made another million dollars" -Jackie Hoffman, Broadway.com Audience Awards
michaelhale said: "Will hold out on actual judgement for when this starts as well as seeing how it grows as a show, but although I support gender-swapping malemain characters because it always opens up fun new female roles that are hardly ever written, god when things are changed around them to make sure it remains a straight-friendly story it makes my skin crawl. So much effort just to keep media straight is... Exhausting."
Hardly ever written? Females have by far the best roles in musical theatre. This is one of the few male roles that are actually interesting. (maybe you were making the more general claim that good roles are hard to come by for everybody - in which case I concede you have a point).
"You can't overrate Bernadette Peters. She is such a genius. There's a moment in "Too Many Mornings" and Bernadette doing 'I wore green the last time' - It's a voice that is just already given up - it is so sorrowful. Tragic. You can see from that moment the show is going to be headed into such dark territory and it hinges on this tiny throwaway moment of the voice." - Ben Brantley (2022)
"Bernadette's whole, stunning performance [as Rose in Gypsy] galvanized the actors capable of letting loose with her. Bernadette's Rose did take its rightful place, but too late, and unseen by too many who should have seen it" Arthur Laurents (2009)
"Sondheim's own favorite star performances? [Bernadette] Peters in ''Sunday in the Park,'' Lansbury in ''Sweeney Todd'' and ''obviously, Ethel was thrilling in 'Gypsy.'' Nytimes, 2000
Can someone explain to me why a female version of Company is ok with Sondheim, but he vehemently opposes a gay male version? I really don't understand this.
Making Bobby bisexual would be an easy swap. Making Bobby a heterosexual woman requires complete rewrites of "Have I Got a Girl for You," "Someone Is Waiting," and "Poor Baby."
He supports a gay VERSION of the piece, but not a gay READING of the piece; to him, reading Bobby as closeted takes away the show's commentary on the generation gap, middle age and "couples culture," and simply turns it into the story of a man with a secret.
I can't wait to see this. It feels like the most exciting Sondheim revival we've had in years (at least, for me). Perhaps since the 2011 Follies.
"You can't overrate Bernadette Peters. She is such a genius. There's a moment in "Too Many Mornings" and Bernadette doing 'I wore green the last time' - It's a voice that is just already given up - it is so sorrowful. Tragic. You can see from that moment the show is going to be headed into such dark territory and it hinges on this tiny throwaway moment of the voice." - Ben Brantley (2022)
"Bernadette's whole, stunning performance [as Rose in Gypsy] galvanized the actors capable of letting loose with her. Bernadette's Rose did take its rightful place, but too late, and unseen by too many who should have seen it" Arthur Laurents (2009)
"Sondheim's own favorite star performances? [Bernadette] Peters in ''Sunday in the Park,'' Lansbury in ''Sweeney Todd'' and ''obviously, Ethel was thrilling in 'Gypsy.'' Nytimes, 2000
Well at least that will make sense with the last scene in Act 1...Jamie could be bisexual, which fits the moment when Bobby panics and asks Amy to marry him...
Really looking forward to hear what people think of this. Company is one of my favorite musicals, and this production sounds really intriguing to me. My only concern is taking it out of the 70's. The musical sounds so 70's. One of my problems (and I had many) with the Doyle revival was that it chose to place the action in contemporary times. I loathed the orchestrations as they took much of the magic out of the music. Hopefully that doesn't happen here, too. I'm cautiously optimistic. Elliott is a magical director. At the very least, I'm sure it won't be boring.
I'd love some fresh, fun, contemporary orchestrations for this piece. I agree that the orchestrations in the Doyle production were thin and sucked some of the life out of the score. I'm really intetested in how this production will work. Hopefully it's well recieved and we'll see it over here in New York.
I agree that the orchestrations need to have a contemporary sound here. ==I just hope they don't suck the life out of the melody the way Doyle's did. I'm not opposed to the show being set in modern day. Hopefully the person doing the orchestrations lovingly handles the score with care.
And it would be nice to have a Bobby/Bobbie who doesn't play the role like it's Hamlet or King Lear.
Very excited here to be going to London to see this revamped production...i am there on the very first Saturday night and cannot wait to see the changes that are being made...on a side note i saw the original Broadway production in the Summer of 1970...it was my very first Broadway show seen on Broadway...so this is a full circle sort of thing for me...and now having a same sex male couple in the show will be even more exciting...thank you Stephen Sondheim for allowing these changes!
reginula said: "Is this where we come to pray for a Broadway transfer?"
YES.
And I also recall more than one party saying the gay version directed by John Tiffany in a reading didn't work. I could be making this up, but something about the tone of the piece, the humor felt wrong with gay men - makes sense to me.