quizking101 said: "
However, the productionis pretty much the cinematic experience of the year - which would be fine if it wasn’t in a Broadway house at Broadway prices. I should not feel so disconnected enough from 75% of what’s happening on stage to think I’m watching a movie being made in real time.
I’m not necessarily saying that the camera work is not innovative, but it, at times, threatens to (if not outright) outshine the star of the show itself - especially when it goes into Dorian’s bacchanalian era and the plot starts to go sideways a bit. I wonder what a slightly more conventional, Jefferson Mays-esque approach would’ve turned out, or balancing the use of live performance and cinematography like SUNSET"
That's very much describes the way I felt about this show. Much has been said about Sarah Snook's phenomenal (sometimes over the top) performance, so not repeating points here.
But yes, 90% of the time I found myself watching the screens, not the actor . After the show ended, I thought that it wouldn't even matter f any seats were marked partial or restricted view because you wind up following up what's on screens anyway. I caught myself many times looking for the actor on stage and she was either blocked by screens or stage props and cameramen.
For me, screens never took away from the live performances during Sunset Blvd. Camerawork was never long or overpowering enough to distract me from actors on stage.
Can't say the same thing thing about Dorian Gray. The technical part of this was flawless and impressive, but I wish I was watching Sarah Snook, not multiple screens for 2 hours, most of the time not even paying attention where she was on the stage. I didn't pay a lot for my side mezzanine seat, $89 to be exact, and I can't imagine paying more for what this play is. To me, this production is the very definition of gimmick.
Updated On: 3/24/25 at 12:22 PM