Lol there are definitely scenes, lines, and lyrics in this script that got cut from the final film... Maybe take a look?
Definitely will. Waiting for the FYC paperback being sent out to industry folks so it’ll be much easier to read. I went by what I was told (that heresay situation) but I’ll take your word for it as I trust you DID read it unlike me. Stoked to read it now. Thanks.
joevitus said: "Lyrics? I thought one of the reasons people were celebrating this movie is because all the songs are in there, complete."
There is a montage after Popular but before Dr. Dillamond got fired where the fivesome (Elphie, Galinda, Fiyero, Nessa, and Boq) sing a reprise of Dancing Through Life that included new lyrics. This obviously got cut from the final version, but pictures of the montage are available on the internet.
RE: Cynthia vs Ariana Grande I agree that Ariana Grande exceeded all expectations (vocally & acting) while Cynthia comes across a little low energy at times. However, isn't that the nature of the character and doesn't the same thing always happen on stage (see also, Ben Brantley's rave for Kristen in original review)? I always personally felt that Elphabas differentiated themselves based on their voices while Glindas differentiated themselves based on their acting.
I love Cynthia's vocals and the way she does the rocky ending of "Defying Gravity" feels iconic in itself while still paying homage to the original. I would say though it has also made me find even more appreciation in Idina Menzel's original recordings too - her voice to me sounds much thicker and more theatrical than Cynthia's.
"You can't overrate Bernadette Peters. She is such a genius. There's a moment in "Too Many Mornings" and Bernadette doing 'I wore green the last time' - It's a voice that is just already given up - it is so sorrowful. Tragic. You can see from that moment the show is going to be headed into such dark territory and it hinges on this tiny throwaway moment of the voice." - Ben Brantley (2022)
"Bernadette's whole, stunning performance [as Rose in Gypsy] galvanized the actors capable of letting loose with her. Bernadette's Rose did take its rightful place, but too late, and unseen by too many who should have seen it" Arthur Laurents (2009)
"Sondheim's own favorite star performances? [Bernadette] Peters in ''Sunday in the Park,'' Lansbury in ''Sweeney Todd'' and ''obviously, Ethel was thrilling in 'Gypsy.'' Nytimes, 2000
It’ll have a nice first week, but most of the reviewswill be tepid (save for the two leads’ performances) and it will be overshadowed by MOANA 2 come Turkey Day."
Why is Elphaba green? I know who her father is, but that doesn’t really explain it, or where she gets her power from. The glowing green elixir, I’m sure, but where did that come from?
Beyoncé is not an ally. Actions speak louder than words, Mrs. Carter. #Dubai #$$$
Jay Lerner-Z said: "I forget, somebody please remind me.
Why is Elphaba green? I know who her father is, but that doesn’t really explain it, or where she gets her power from. The glowing green elixir, I’m sure, but where did that come from?"
That’s kind of the extent of the explanation in the stage show. There’s a line in the show, like, “she was a child of both worlds,” explaining her power. So, kind of no explanation, haha.
Jay Lerner-Z said: "I forget, somebody please remind me.
Why is Elphaba green? I know who her father is, but that doesn’t really explain it, or where she gets her power from. The glowing green elixir, I’m sure, but where did that come from?"
Girl... these are some Cinema Sins level questions...
Jay Lerner-Z said: "I forget, somebody please remind me.
Why is Elphaba green? I know who her father is, but that doesn’t really explain it, or where she gets her power from. The glowing green elixir, I’m sure, but where did that come from?"
Most likely, the Wizard got the elixir from Yackle (a character from McGuire's book that is not in the musical).
Also likely, your local library will have the audiobook available for loan. The narrator of the audiobook (John McDonough) is excellent, but you'll have to endure a lot of McGuire's political narrative which, IMO, drags the story down.
When you're familiar with McGuire's book, you can pick up on a lot of allusions to it that appear in the stage musical (like why the bustle & train of Mdme Morrible's costume looks like a fish, where Elphaba was physically birthed, etc.).
That title feels more appropriate for a tie-in book than a continuation of the first movie. Would definitely have preferred Part 2 or Part II, but I am (tragically) not Jon Chu or whichever Universal exec made this call. Wicked: For Good feels… cheap.
Considering how they're already discussing how to extend the franchise, I'm surprised they didn't decide to save "Wicked: 4 Good" for the third sequel.
It's only a bit weird to me because we have an on-screen "Part 1" title card in the first film. Either they call it "Part 2" onscreen in the actual film, or they George Lucas the title card from Part 1 so that it's called "Wicked: Defying Gravity" or something.
Scarywarhol said: "It's only a bit weird to me because we have an on-screen "Part 1" title card in the first film. Either they call it "Part 2" onscreen in the actual film, or they George Lucas the title card from Part 1 so that it's called "Wicked: Defying Gravity" or something."
Or just call it Wicked, the way the Mission: Impossible movies changed Dead Reckoning: Part One to Dead Reckoning and the follow-up to The Final Reckoning
As to why, despite the rumors MemorableUserName referenced that WB may be trying to expand the story more, I almost wonder if the opposite might be true. "Part One" and "Part Two" implies the possibility of a "Part Three". "Part One" and "For Good", on the other hand, feels more like a definitive ending, at least comparatively.
I think Universal has been very forthcoming that they want more from this franchise than these two movies, so WHATEVER comes after this, they're not avoiding calling it Part 2 to dissuade the possibility of more to come.
TheatreFan4 said: "I think Universal has been very forthcoming that they want more from this franchise than these two movies, so WHATEVER comes after this, they're not avoiding calling it Part 2 to dissuade the possibility of more to come."
I don’t think that’ll be problem as long as what comes next justifies itself creatively
TaffyDavenport said: "EDSOSLO858 said: "This is going to flop hard.
It’ll have a nice first week, but most of the reviewswill be tepid (save for the two leads’ performances) and it will be overshadowed by MOANA 2 come Turkey Day."
"
That flop hard prediction, because of pre-sales didn't even make sense at the time. However, Moana 2 has technically overshadowed Wicked in terms of ticket sales. It's up to $717 million.
BwayLB said: "TheatreFan4 said: "I think Universal has been very forthcoming that they want more from this franchise than these two movies, so WHATEVER comes after this, they're not avoiding calling it Part 2 to dissuade the possibility of more to come."
I don’t think that’ll be problem as long as what comes next justifies itself creatively"
Well how it would perform is independent, but I fear that very little will end up going into the franchise creatively to justify further projects lol.