What is it that people find so off-kilter about this production? I saw both of the two most recent revivals (in the 90s and 2010s) as well as the current production, and while the staging and costuming is certainly different, I did not get the sense that the thrust or focus of the show, or of the message the director was trying to impart, was substantively different.
I do think that the marketing is...queer. I have always understood the point of Cabaret to be an indictment of complacency and ignorance -- those who party while the world burns. Depicting the Kit Kat Club as raucous and sexually vibrant/open/fluid in the face of the darkness outside the Club serves to underscore how self-involved and deeply oblivious to the real world the masses were.
But the point of the show, in my view, is not to *celebrate* the bachanalia...it's to condemn it. The entire Kit Kat Club crew, aling with Fraulein Schneider, Kolst, Sally Bowles, and even Herr Schultz, try to live their lives in complete ignorance of the world around them, with the denizens of the Club representing the most extreme dedication to self-indulgence. And eventually, all of that burying of the collective heads in the sand leads to their, and society's downfall. For contemporary productions to emphasize, and joyously celbrate, in theirnl advertisimg, the spirit of the Club, is to miss the point of the piece altogether.
Cabaret is timeless, in part because it's warning to contemporary audiences is timeless -- don't be so consumed by your own desire to live a selfish, hedonistic life, oblivious to what is going on in the world around you. The troubles you want to leave out the door will find a way to creep in. Ignoring injustice is not an option.
The advertising for this show seems to suggest it's a great and joyous choice.