GreasedLightning said: "PipingHotPiccolo said: "EDSOSLO858 said: "Groban was utterly fantastic inGreat Cometand I can’t possibly imagine the show without him. With his Pierre Bezukhov, I heard so much character through his singing (instead of just singing beautifully).
He’ll be an exceptional Sweeney."
I thought he was great in Comet, but he was repressed, forlorn, not sinister/homicidal. But hey, cant wait to see"
Yes - it’s called acting.
Why would his character choices as Pierre in Great Comet disqualify him from being sinister as Sweeney?"
i know reading comprehension is a challenge, so im happy to help. big Groban fan. questioned how someone as warm, charismatic, genuine-seeming, could pull off sinister, cynical, homicidal sweeney. said i was eager to see it, but seemed like a stretch.
someone said "but what about comet?" to which i explained, yes, he was great in Comet, but his character was still genuine, sincere- just forlorn and repressed. a different haul than nailing the sardonic and black-hearted sweeney. seems like a stretch for Groban, cant wait to see it.
now that were all caught up, lets take a minute to dissect the implication of the point you think you were making: "its called acting"-- true, but by your application of that concept, all actors are equally suited for all roles. that aint it.