I think it’s very unlikely any songs that didn’t make the theatrical cut will make it into the movie, especially since film adaptations often cut numbers.
I certainly hope they don’t cut Good For You, it’s such a great moment. I still think Rachel Bay Jones was done a disservice, she should’ve had the role onscreen. I’m sure Moore will act it all very well, but I’m wary of her vocal chops which have never been heard I believe.
NameGreg said: "I think it’s very unlikely any songs that didn’t make the theatrical cut will make it into the movie, especially since film adaptations often cut numbers.
I certainly hope they don’t cut Good For You, it’s such a great moment. I still think Rachel Bay Jones was done a disservice, she should’ve had the role onscreen. I’m sure Moore will act it all very well, but I’m wary of her vocal chops which have never been heard I believe."
I’ve felt that way since I heard the casting. BP and RBJ had such a special thing going on up there on stage. Keep them center stage, in the movie, and cast every Meryl Streep, Tom Hanks, or whoever “Hollywood” you want around them. I’m actually surprised they didn’t cast MS as his mom. They usually try to shoehorn her name in wherever they can. Or at least her name is “mentioned.”
I recently watched the 2013 version of Carrie and Julianne Moore, who played Margaret White, did have a brief singing moment where she sang some hymn. She sounded nice, pleasant and in tune; so with training I guess there isn't any reason to be worried about her vocal performance.
The good news is that she won't fall into Lucille Ball, Gerard Butler, and Pierce Brosnan levels of bad singing.
Musical Master said: "I recently watched the 2013 version of Carrie and Julianne Moore, who played Margaret White, did have a briefsinging moment where she sang some hymn. She sounded nice, pleasant and in tune;so with training I guess there isn't any reason to be worried about her vocal performance.
The good news is thatshe won't fall into Lucille Ball, Gerard Butler, and Pierce Brosnan levels of bad singing."
Pleasant isn’t really the thing for a pop rock modern musical. But I mean they made Streep seem like a powerhouse in Prom so anything is possible!
SouthernCakes said: "Eh. I just can’t get behind any of this. This man is here because his father paid for it. They curated a show that best suits his talents. Not saying he isn’t talent. I didn’t see him in the role but he’s clearly a great singer and actor but the fact that his only Broadway credits before this were shows his father has produced just sits weird with me. And how we are all okay with it. How it’s like oh you just need a Tony award winning producer father to get ahead in this business. I don’t know. I think the show - at least on stage - is boring and repetitive. And the trailer is not my thing."
That's a lie and it's important to point that out. Marc Platt had nothing to do with The Book of Mormon. Facts matter.
I've been looking around and saw that several musical podcast/YT channel creators are going to see the movie. Just to see how Evan's questionable actions are going to be portrayed on screen in comparison to the stage show.
degrassifan said: "Dear Evan Hansen will premiere at the Toronto International Film Festival and will be the opening night film. Run time is 131 minutes.
"The sexual energy between the mother and son really concerns me!"-random woman behind me at Next to Normal
"I want to meet him after and bang him!"-random woman who exposed her breasts at Rock of Ages, referring to James Carpinello
I honestly think that as sad as it is, a modern audience does want to/can’t sit for more than an hour and 45 minutes unless it’s some sort of masterpiece with hype that convinces them they must. People don’t have the attention span anymore.
BwayLB said: "^^ With all due respect, I thought the runtime for In the Heights was perfect."
I liked it at its length. That being said, I think people’s attention span is very different who aren’t theater people. I was watching people at the movie theater walk out before “Carnival Del Bario”
Also, the runtime has limited the amount of times it can be shown at the cinema, leading to more financial loss.
So, while I enjoyed it at its full length. The length had negative effects. I think at least 20 minutes could’ve been cut.
I haven’t confirmed this yet, but the EW article reads as if DEH will stream worldwide on Sept 9, along with the premiere. Last year, TIFF films could be streamed IF you live(d) in Canada. If true, this changes the perspective (I’m not sure if that’s good or bad). Anyone know what’s up with this?
I have no problem with ANY running time if it’s appropriate and paced correctly… Curious/cautious about this one though. DEH was about 2:10 on-stage I believe (subtracting the intermission). This is the same length with a few songs cut out? Same with ITH (similar length but songs cut); didn’t mind it in that case tho, so as far as DEH — we’ll see.
Jordan Levinson said: "degrassifan said: "Dear Evan Hansen will premiere at the Toronto International Film Festival and will be the opening night film. Run time is 131 minutes.
BCfitasafiddle said: "BwayLB said: "^^ With all due respect, I thought the runtime for In the Heights was perfect."
I liked it at its length. That being said, I think people’s attention span is very different who aren’t theater people. I was watching people at the movie theater walk out before “Carnival Del Bario”
Also, the runtime has limited the amount of times it can be shown at the cinema, leading to more financial loss.
So, while I enjoyed it at its full length. The length had negative effects. I think at least 20 minutes could’ve been cut."
To each their own I guess. In the Heights didn’t deserve to flop. Not with all the beauty and hard work put into the movie. And I waited since 2010 when I saw the national tour for this.