JBroadway said: "blaxx said: "Y'all put way too much weight on the Tonys. The awards are biased recognition, they're not an absolute truth.
It's just a dozen random professionals casting a vote, not the judgment from the Theater God.
The decision will only be properly assessed with time."
I agree with you to an extent. Despite my many posts participating in the Tony threads, I have found myself increasingly frustrated at the nature of the Tonys in general, particularly how narrow the scope of eligibility is. I can't help but feel like the prestige of the Tony Award is one of the greatest smoke-and-mirrors tricks in showbiz.
But regardless of how they earned their prestige, they have it, and it can create lasting ripple-effects. Not as much as it used to, maybe, and not as much as some other awards shows. But the effects can still be tangible. Mainly, a Best Musical win (which this particular thread is mostly about) still has the power to make or break a show financially. We've also seen it impact what kinds of projects get written and produced afterward (I realize this 2nd point is more is less tangible, and more subjective and circumstantial, but I still think it matters).
A win for A Strange Loop could be highly beneficial in both regards: (a) the show is struggling at the box office, and this could very well be the difference between success and failure for them, and (b) the show, right now is unique in many ways. It would be great if, in 5-10 years, it wasn't so unique.
"
I only agree that a Best Musical win guarantees recoupment. Only one musical in 22 years has not recouped.
Past that, no other win or category means much for profits. So, all the producers and investors who wait for the Tonys to turn their fate around are in the wishful thinking / delusional boat. Only one production will reap the benefits of the awards.
Total smoke and mirrors, you are absolutely right.
Listen, I don't take my clothes off for anyone, even if it is "artistic". - JANICE