As one of those who softened on the old bloke last year, I will say that you’re right Hogan. I don’t think I lambasted you publicly, but I did think ALW’s cheerleading was earnest and real.
Why close the whole f*cking thing over this? Unless sales weren’t good or there was bad word of mouth, and it didn’t seem that way…
As far as sales go, I think one thing should be taken into consideration which is that the UK still hasn’t allowed many tourists in without having to quarantine so there are no tourist dollars coming in, which greatly impact a show like this. So it’s not exactly fair to say “he’s just mad because people aren’t buying tickets to it”, because it’s much more complicated than that.
His message sounded awful whiney to me....but how awful for the cast and crew.
If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it?
These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.
From the time it was announced that someone in the show tested positive and that they were doing rigorous testing I wondered why, after all of his rallying to open theater, they didn't require that everyone with the production be vaccinated.
I wonder if he will reverse his decision now that they just announced this morning that England is lifting all restrictions?
If I’m not mistaken, not everyone in the UK is eligible yet. So there’s a lot of younger people who haven’t had a chance to be vaxxed.
And this is COMPLETELY different from the rules we have in place in America, for anyone confused and wondering what this means for Broadway. If they had the same rules in place there that we do, the show would still be going on.
Thanks Jordan, I do now remember seeing some people on BBC news say they were not eligible yet. I wonder how they are doing that as these people were adults?
There are some younger adults in the ensemble, so it’s possible it was one of them or even one of the vaccinated adults who had a breakthrough case. It again, ALW said nobody else tested positive so that’s a good thing to remember, when looking at the effectiveness of vaccines and being around someone who tests positive.
The truth is that a large number of the cast won’t have been eligible to be vaccinated until very recently- in the last few weeks for some. And you are only fully protected when you’ve had both jabs (at least 8 weeks apart here in uK).
It’s just incredibly unfair that theatre is being so affected when sporting events seem to go ahead with huge crowds and no issues.
Jordan Catalano said: "If I’m not mistaken, not everyone in the UK is eligible yet. So there’s a lot of younger people who haven’t had a chance to be vaxxed.
And this is COMPLETELY different from the rules we have in place in America, for anyone confused and wondering what this means for Broadway. If they had the same rules in place there that we do, the show would still be going on. "
I really hope you're right. I'm starting to fear some Broadway shows will simply never reopen.
I was excited to see Cinderella in London this fall too, this is sad.
Listen, I don't take my clothes off for anyone, even if it is "artistic". - JANICE
It is well to remember that this is the same person who announced Cinderella was opening notwithstanding it being unlawful, that, oh, no it wasn't even though the government created a path by which it could, etc etc etc. If you want to make sense of what's happened and is likely to happen, I recommend studying two things: Tory politics and mental illness.
The whole thing is strange. The comments on here from a few folks who saw it did not suggest it was likely to be such a flop it wasn't even worth opening. Actually, while I know people are of different minds about ALW, I'd think an ALW show would have a decent advance simply because of him. Being in the states I'm not sure what "blunt instrument that is the Government’s isolation guidance" refers to but I'm assuming the problem would have been known the moment someone tested positive-which should have caused the cancellation at that point.
A few possible theories:
1. ALW knows something we don't about soon-to-be announced restrictions which would make opening a waste of time.
2. When the restrictions affected seating capacity for the previews, ALW pledged to personally absorb the losses caused by the reduced capacity, up until the time of the opening. Obviously, he's in a position to "absorb" plenty of losses, but in fairness to the man he should not be expected to do so indefinitely. If he's aware its now going to be a while until the show can open maybe he felt a need to pull the plug? (or if you want to be less charitable towards him, he used the "up until opening" part of the pledge as an escape clause).
Also, a question for our British friends. There are references in the thread to ALW being a Tory and this being behind some of his actions with respect to the shutdown/restrictions. My understanding of the term "Tory" is that it refers to a member of the Conservative Party- but Boris Johnson is (by that definition) a Tory. So why would ALW being a Tory be the reason behind his criticism of the policies of a Tory government? (I'm hoping this does not turn into an ugly political debate. Just looking for clarification of the terms).
"So why would ALW being a Tory be the reason behind his criticism of the policies of a Tory government? (I'm hoping this does not turn into an ugly political debate. Just looking for clarification of the terms). "
The general criticism is that a Tory/conservative would be more concerned with economic outcomes than health outcomes*, and that ALW's motivations about keeping theatres open with no social distancing in the middle of a pandemic reflect this. I see the slight contradiction because it is a Tory government that are making the decisions here but that's not the main point of the argument.
* of course, the complexity and tragedy of the world in reality is that these outcomes are not completely orthogonal so you need to be careful about suppressing economic outcomes in capitalist societies - the choice is never as easy as some people make it sound
RE: Cinderella, the show had a poor advance but I don't know what it would have been like in 'normal' times. I am a bit shocked at the 'closure' but I am still confused if the show has actually closed for good or if ALW is just seeking attention...
"You can't overrate Bernadette Peters. She is such a genius. There's a moment in "Too Many Mornings" and Bernadette doing 'I wore green the last time' - It's a voice that is just already given up - it is so sorrowful. Tragic. You can see from that moment the show is going to be headed into such dark territory and it hinges on this tiny throwaway moment of the voice." - Ben Brantley (2022)
"Bernadette's whole, stunning performance [as Rose in Gypsy] galvanized the actors capable of letting loose with her. Bernadette's Rose did take its rightful place, but too late, and unseen by too many who should have seen it" Arthur Laurents (2009)
"Sondheim's own favorite star performances? [Bernadette] Peters in ''Sunday in the Park,'' Lansbury in ''Sweeney Todd'' and ''obviously, Ethel was thrilling in 'Gypsy.'' Nytimes, 2000
binau said: ""So why would ALW being a Tory be the reason behind his criticism of the policies of a Tory government? (I'm hoping this does not turn into an ugly political debate. Just looking for clarification of the terms). "
The general criticism is that a Tory/conservative would be more concerned with economic outcomes than health outcomes*, and that ALW's motivations about keeping theatres open with no social distancing in the middle of a pandemic reflect this. I see the slight contradiction because it is a Tory government that are making the decisions here but that'snot the main point of the argument.
* of course, the complexity and tragedy of the world in reality is that these outcomes are not completely orthogonal so you need to be careful about suppressing economic outcomes in capitalist societies - the choice is never as easy as some people make it sound
RE: Cinderella, the show had a poor advance but I don't know what it would have been like in 'normal' times. I am a bit shocked at the 'closure' but I am still confused if the show has actually closed for good or if ALW is just seeking attention..."
ALW has had plenty of spats on Boris Johnson and Trump over the past few years . This show also has a progressive plotline with LGBT characters . I think ALW has changed his mind on things .. Plus, London is getting a black Christine for once !
I like what I've seen and heard so far. Regardless of whether the show is ultimately a hit or not, Covid will still be blamed for impeding any momentum the show may have had. That goes for pretty much every new show opening now and other shows attempting to start back up and rebuild an audience at this time.
kdogg36 said: "MannPhan24601 said: "This show also has a progressive plotline with LGBT characters . I think ALW has changed his mind on things ."
For what it's worth, ALW voted in favor of marriage equality when it came before the House of Lords about eight years ago."
Let us not forget that one can be an economic conservation and still not favor heinous social policies. That does not redeem the evil of those economic policies.