Broadway Star Joined: 12/28/15
Isn’t Six all but confirmed for the Longacre in the Spring?
Leading Actor Joined: 5/9/15
Someone posted Six was taking the Brookes after Waitress on another thread
That’s a very long time to hold a theatre dark for. I mean, “The Prom” is closing in the middle of summer and it sure won’t take the Fall and the Winter to get that house ready for something like “Six”.
Understudy Joined: 1/18/16
Hamilfan2 said: "Isn’t Six all but confirmed for the Longacre in the Spring? "
Someone posted in another thread that it's taking the Brooks Atkinson after Waitress closes
If Six is at the Brooks this spring then id say whoever posted abut Secret Life of Bees this fall at the Longacre is likely correct.
Featured Actor Joined: 3/27/16
Mike Barrett said: "If Six is at the Brooks this spring then id say whoever posted abut Secret Life of Bees this fall at the Longacreis likely correct."
I heard Secret Life of Bees will take the Booth
Broadway Legend Joined: 4/30/16
BritCrit said: "Mike Barrett said: "Brooks Atkinson now available for Spring 2020 as well. Not sure what would play here. Seems like a potential nice house for The Secret Life of Bees."
I would personally choose a play or musical where most of the creative team are female. It would be a good way of showing that Waitress has succeeded in allowingfemale creative teams to flourish on Broadway. The Secret Life of Bees has a feamle book writer and lyricist, so it could be selected..."
I'm not sure why this line of thinking always comes out in these sorts of threads...the creative team has literally zero say in the theatre any given show goes into. Just not how the real estate works. Sure, they can have requirements for their production (like stage size, wing space, etc.), but that's where it ends.
I've heard murmurings of a few of the houses getting filled.
Nederlander - Once Upon A One More Time
Longacre - Diana
Simon - Don't Stop 'Til You Get Enough
Brooks - Maybe Dreamgirls?
Studio 54 - Six
If I had to guess, Secret Life of Bees would be a great fit in the Cort. Lehman Trilogy is still circling I'd imagine (maybe one of the open Nederlander houses?) and Blue which could in theory end up at the Lyceum. Not surprised no one is rushing to take the Lyceum for the Fall given the rest of the open houses popping up. I wouldn't be surprised if the Sondheim opens up shortly as well.
JVJ93 said: "Mike Barrett said: "If Six is at the Brooks this spring then id say whoever posted abut Secret Life of Bees this fall at the Longacreis likely correct."
I heard Secret Life of Bees will take the Booth"
Oh id love this.
Broadway Legend Joined: 4/30/16
I heard Secret Life of Bees will take the Booth"
Oh id love this."
Ohhhh I forgot about the Booth, but YES.
Is Secret Life of Bees "commercial" enough to not play MTC? I believe the Friedman still has a spot open next spring. I remember some rumors of Lempicka playing there, that'd be AWESOME.
Mike Barrett said: "Is Secret Life of Bees "commercial" enough to not play MTC?”
I’m confused by your phrasing. It sounds like you’re implying that Bees is not commercial enough to play anywhere except as part of MTC’s season, which I don’t think is true at all. It might not be the most commercial of musicals, but it will likely have enough power as a prestige piece to get attention - or at least that will be what investors are banking on.
Also, this show is very unlike MTC’s usual programming. Mainly because they rarely ever do musicals. They could always make an exception for something like Lempicka, but dobutfully for something like Bees. It would be surprising to see them take on a show that already started at another NYC non-profit. I suppose they COULD rent the theatre out, but I’ve never known them to do that in the 5 or so years I’ve been following MTC. Plus they would only be able to lease it for a limited run, because MTC has to produce a full season for their subscribers.
Sorry, my point was not that I thought it Wasn't commercial enough, but I was just wondering if we should expect it to be part of MTC's season or not or if that has a chance to take its spring slot. Thats all. I know they often don't do muscials or more commercial productions if that makes sense so that was my reasoning.
Secret Life Of Bees will not be playing MTC. It has commercial producers attached. (MTC has also only done 3 musicals in the past 25 years and two were brought to them by Hal Prince.)
Broadway Legend Joined: 1/30/15
inception said: "Interesting. The review in the New Yorker of Secret Life of Bees didn't make it sound Broadway ready. The writer especially mentions that set is "workshop-like.""
Aside from some little things that were mimed and would probably be done differently in a bigger production, I think the staging was intentionally "rustic." I liked having the band on stage and everything associated with the bees and that setting. What they need to do is work on those lyrics. As much as the performers were selling it, at times the lyrics approached Bright Star levels of bad.
An usher at Hillary and Clinton mentioned Slave Play would be coming in so that seemed pretty set unless they decide to switch theaters.
Broadway Legend Joined: 3/23/17
VintageSnarker said: "An usher at Hillary and Clinton mentioned Slave Play would be coming in so that seemed pretty set unless they decide to switch theaters."
This was already announced a week ago.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/11/theater/slave-play-jeremy-harris-broadway.html
Broadway Star Joined: 5/15/11
A Christmas show is going to the Lyceum in November
Dolly80 said: "A Christmas show is going to the Lyceum in November"
Reuben & Clay?
But seriously, I'm a bit curious about the Cique du Soleil x-mas show that will play MSG's Hulu theatre.
Will the Stephen Sondheim be dark through the winter? I'm guessing that the reason Beautiful is staying on through the end of October is that nothing else wants the space badly right away.
Broadway Star Joined: 3/10/19
inception said: "Dolly80 said: "A Christmas show is going to the Lyceum in November"
Reuben & Clay?
But seriously, I a bit curious about the Cique du Soleil x-mas show that will play MSG's Hulu theatre.
Will the Stephen Sondheim be dark through the winter? I'm guessing that the reason Beautiful is staying on through the end of October is that nothing else wants the space badly right away."
I know it's not a Shubert theatre, but I would love to see Company transfer there, or maybe that rumored revival of Assassins that always shows up on the chat boards every few months. After all, what better to fill the Stephen Sondheim theatre than a Stephen Sondheim show?
MollyJeanneMusic said: "...but I would love to see Company transfer there, or maybe that rumored revival of Assassins that always shows up on the chat boards every few months. After all, what better to fill the Stephen Sondheim theatre than a Stephen Sondheim show?"
Maybe the Doyle production happening next Spring? That's also probably wishful thinking, as I can't think of a Classic Stage Company transfer. I'm at least excited for a new Assassin's production coming back to NYC.
Swing Joined: 10/4/19
@Ledaero
I'm actually pretty excited about Don't Stop Til' You Get Enough coming in, and I think you all will be excited as well once you see it. From workshops, the show is really wonderful. And I HATE jukeboxes. Lynn Nottage is doing a brilliant job in constructing the narrative. It's not a typical bio-musical, and last draft I know of had it all structured within a single rehearsal for the Dangerous tour and most of it is focusing on the psychological/social/cultural issues Jackson was facing. Since the release of Leaving Neverland, they've gone deep into rewrites of how to refocus the story to be inclusive of the information presented in the documentary. And Nottage is a firm believer in the boys, so I'm sure everything will come out politically acceptable."
So politically acceptable means uncritically accept any and all allegations no matter who absurd, contradictory and provably false they are? Robson and Safechuck are not boys they are men. They are also proven serial liars (they repeatedly changed their stories since they decided to play the victim and claimed literally impossible things) who both only accused Jackson when they had financial problems and for 6 years they did everything they could to extort millions from Jackson's Estate. They are accusing MJJ Production of procuring kids for molestation and absolute nonsense that, notice, they did not mention in Leaving Neverland because if they had those people at MJJ Production could sue them for defamation. THey only claim this in court where their lies are protected by the litigation privilege. If this was true they would have mentioned it in the movie too. And if they are lying about that company why on earth do you think they won't lie about Michael Jackson too to get the money they want?
Their allegations are heavily based on Victor Gutierrez's sick fantasies and NAMBLA supporter pedophilia advocate whom Jackson successfully sued for defamation. Leaving Neverland has been debunked months ago but most of the media refuses to report the irrefutable evidence that their allegations cannot possibly be true.
Numerous documentaries came out to expose this fraud you can watch them on YouTube.
They will include "information" from a propaganda film but no information from the court documents which prove that film is a pack of lies?
Lies of Leaving Neverland
Leaving Neverland : Echoes of a Pedophilia Apologist
Debunking Leaving Neverland: The Gutierrez Factor
Michael Jackson And Wade Robson: The Real Story
Neverland Firsthand: Investigating the Michael Jackson Documentary
Leaving Neverland (Take Two) - Full Documentary
Michael Jackson - Chase the truth 2019 - New Documentary
Michael Jackson: Square One - Official Trailer
Some media had the guts to report the actual evidence that Robson Safechuck are brazen liars
Google "James Safechuck's Michael Jackson abuse claims 'exposed as pure fiction'"
Google "Wade Robson's Michael Jackson allegation timeline disproven by his mother "
Google "Leaving Neverland 'LIES' exposed: 'Wade Robson lied about more than Michael Jackson abuse'"
Google "Leaving Neverland shock: Director admits part of Michael Jackson abuse claim is 'WRONG'"
Google "Leaving Neverland 'LIAR': 'These Michael Jackson claims are IMPOSSIBLE, here is the proof' "
Google "Leaving Neverland’ Director’s Attempt To Spin Reported Discrepancy Appears To Backfire"
Google "REPORT: ‘Leaving Neverland’ Discrepancy Found In Key Part Of Film Denouncing Michael Jackson"
Google "Michael Jackson accuser 'LIES': 'Wade Robson's own mother CONTRADICTED his testimony'"
Google "What You Should Know About the New Michael Jackson Documentary"
Google "Michael Jackson and why a jury would struggle to convict him of latest allegations"
Google "I don’t believe Michael Jackson’s accusers in ‘Leaving Neverland’"
Google "“Leaving Neverland” Weaves A Provocative Narrative But Is It Just One Big Lie?"
Google "Why is U.S. Media Silent on the Implosion of Leaving Neverland, While the U.K. Press is Pouncing?"
nemoran said: "@Ledaero
I'm actually pretty excited about Don't Stop Til' You Get Enough coming in, and I think you all will be excited as well once you see it. From workshops, the show is really wonderful. And I HATE jukeboxes. Lynn Nottage is doing a brilliant job in constructing the narrative. It's not a typical bio-musical, and last draft I know of had it all structured within a single rehearsal for the Dangerous tour and most of it is focusing on the psychological/social/cultural issues Jackson was facing. Since the release of Leaving Neverland, they've gone deep into rewrites of how to refocus the story to be inclusive of the information presented in the documentary. And Nottage is a firm believer in the boys, so I'm sure everything will come out politically acceptable."
So politically acceptable means uncritically accept any and all allegations no matter who absurd, contradictory and provably false they are? Robson and Safechuck are not boys they are men. They are also proven serial liars (they repeatedly changed their stories since they decided to play the victim and claimed literally impossible things) who both only accused Jackson when they had financial problems and for 6 years they did everything they could to extort millions from Jackson's Estate. They are accusing MJJ Production of procuring kids for molestation and absolute nonsense that, notice, they did not mention in Leaving Neverland because if they had those people at MJJ Production could sue them for defamation. THey only claim this in court where their lies are protected by the litigation privilege. If this was true they would have mentioned it in the movie too. And if they are lying about that company why on earth do you think they won't lie about Michael Jackson too to get the money they want?
Their allegations are heavily based on Victor Gutierrez's sick fantasies and NAMBLA supporter pedophilia advocate whom Jackson successfully sued for defamation. Leaving Neverland has been debunked months ago but most of the media refuses to report the irrefutable evidence that their allegations cannot possibly be true.
Numerous documentaries came out to expose this fraud you cant watch them on YouTube.
They will include "information" from a propaganda film but no information from the court documents which prove that film is a pack of lies?
Lies of Leaving Neverland
Leaving Neverland : Echoes of a Pedophilia Apologist
Debunking Leaving Neverland: The Gutierrez Factor
Michael Jackson And Wade Robson: The Real Story
Neverland Firsthand: Investigating the Michael Jackson Documentary
Leaving Neverland (Take Two) - Full Documentary
Michael Jackson - Chase the truth 2019 - New Documentary
Michael Jackson: Square One - Official Trailer
Some media had the guts to report the actual evidence that Robson Safechuck are brazen liars
Google "James Safechuck's Michael Jackson abuse claims 'exposed as pure fiction'"
Google "Wade Robson's Michael Jackson allegation timeline disproven by his mother "
Google "Leaving Neverland 'LIES' exposed: 'Wade Robson lied about more than Michael Jackson abuse'"
Google "Leaving Neverland shock: Director admits part of Michael Jackson abuse claim is 'WRONG'"
Google "Leaving Neverland 'LIAR': 'These Michael Jackson claims are IMPOSSIBLE, here is the proof' "
Google "Leaving Neverland’ Director’s Attempt To Spin Reported Discrepancy Appears To Backfire"
Google "REPORT: ‘Leaving Neverland’ Discrepancy Found In Key Part Of Film Denouncing Michael Jackson"
Google "Michael Jackson accuser 'LIES': 'Wade Robson's own mother CONTRADICTED his testimony'"
Google "What You Should Know About the New Michael Jackson Documentary"
Google "Michael Jackson and why a jury would struggle to convict him of latest allegations"
Google "I don’t believe Michael Jackson’s accusers in ‘Leaving Neverland’"
Google "“Leaving Neverland” Weaves A Provocative Narrative But Is It Just One Big Lie?"
Google "Why is U.S. Media Silent on the Implosion of Leaving Neverland, While the U.K. Press is Pouncing?""
If you could go back to the hole you crawled out from, that’d be great.
Swing Joined: 10/4/19
BJR said: "I find it hard to believe the Estate, which is only doing this for the cash, will allow child molestation allegations to be treated with validity in the show."
Given the amount of evidence that the allegations are bogus concocted by entitled families looking for a huge payout it would be sheer insanity to treat them with validity.
nemoran said: "@Ledaero
I'm actually pretty excited about Don't Stop Til' You Get Enough coming in, and I think you all will be excited as well once you see it. From workshops, the show is really wonderful. And I HATE jukeboxes. Lynn Nottage is doing a brilliant job in constructing the narrative. It's not a typical bio-musical, and last draft I know of had it all structured within a single rehearsal for the Dangerous tour and most of it is focusing on the psychological/social/cultural issues Jackson was facing. Since the release of Leaving Neverland, they've gone deep into rewrites of how to refocus the story to be inclusive of the information presented in the documentary. And Nottage is a firm believer in the boys, so I'm sure everything will come out politically acceptable."
So politically acceptable means uncritically accept any and all allegations no matter who absurd, contradictory and provably false they are? Robson and Safechuck are not boys they are men. They are also proven serial liars (they repeatedly changed their stories since they decided to play the victim and claimed literally impossible things) who both only accused Jackson when they had financial problems and for 6 years they did everything they could to extort millions from Jackson's Estate. They are accusing MJJ Production of procuring kids for molestation and absolute nonsense that, notice, they did not mention in Leaving Neverland because if they had those people at MJJ Production could sue them for defamation. THey only claim this in court where their lies are protected by the litigation privilege. If this was true they would have mentioned it in the movie too. And if they are lying about that company why on earth do you think they won't lie about Michael Jackson too to get the money they want?
Their allegations are heavily based on Victor Gutierrez's sick fantasies and NAMBLA supporter pedophilia advocate whom Jackson successfully sued for defamation. Leaving Neverland has been debunked months ago but most of the media refuses to report the irrefutable evidence that their allegations cannot possibly be true.
Numerous documentaries came out to expose this fraud you cant watch them on YouTube.
They will include "information" from a propaganda film but no information from the court documents which prove that film is a pack of lies?
Lies of Leaving Neverland
Leaving Neverland : Echoes of a Pedophilia Apologist
Debunking Leaving Neverland: The Gutierrez Factor
Michael Jackson And Wade Robson: The Real Story
Neverland Firsthand: Investigating the Michael Jackson Documentary
Leaving Neverland (Take Two) - Full Documentary
Michael Jackson - Chase the truth 2019 - New Documentary
Michael Jackson: Square One - Official Trailer
Some media had the guts to report the actual evidence that Robson Safechuck are brazen liars
Google "James Safechuck's Michael Jackson abuse claims 'exposed as pure fiction'"
Google "Wade Robson's Michael Jackson allegation timeline disproven by his mother "
Google "Leaving Neverland 'LIES' exposed: 'Wade Robson lied about more than Michael Jackson abuse'"
Google "Leaving Neverland shock: Director admits part of Michael Jackson abuse claim is 'WRONG'"
Google "Leaving Neverland 'LIAR': 'These Michael Jackson claims are IMPOSSIBLE, here is the proof' "
Google "Leaving Neverland’ Director’s Attempt To Spin Reported Discrepancy Appears To Backfire"
Google "REPORT: ‘Leaving Neverland’ Discrepancy Found In Key Part Of Film Denouncing Michael Jackson"
Google "Michael Jackson accuser 'LIES': 'Wade Robson's own mother CONTRADICTED his testimony'"
Google "What You Should Know About the New Michael Jackson Documentary"
Google "Michael Jackson and why a jury would struggle to convict him of latest allegations"
Google "I don’t believe Michael Jackson’s accusers in ‘Leaving Neverland’"
Google "“Leaving Neverland” Weaves A Provocative Narrative But Is It Just One Big Lie?"
Google "Why is U.S. Media Silent on the Implosion of Leaving Neverland, While the U.K. Press is Pouncing?""
Came out of exile to say that this is the second time I've seen pedophila defended on this site recently, as I lurk in the shadow. Not a good look and abhorrent.
Swing Joined: 10/4/19
n2nbaby said: " If you could go back to the hole you crawled out from, that’d be great."
Why ? Could you actually refute anything I said or you just don't like to hear what I said as it destroys what you want to believe?
Did you follow the Robson Safechuck court cases since 2013? I did. The two are the biggest frauds I have ever seen they are making a mockery of child sex abuse for financial gain.
Videos