NOWaWarning said: "I think her name and the show would sell great for a limited run. And if it gets good reviews, awards, etc., that could keep it running even longer. And they could get some great replacements to take over just like in the original run."
Funny, I have always felt that a key reason the original didn’t run longer was because of the weak people they hired to replace her, first Jane Morgan, then Janis Paige. By the time Ann Miller — who was also not a box office attraction — came and got terrific reviews, it was too late. The first two were absolutely people who were never going to bring in audiences. They needed David Merrill to produce it.
I did see Ann Miller in the role and she was very good...even managed to get a tap solo into That’s How Young I Feel, which previously IMO was the weak link in the show.
Re the poster who said that Toni Collette is not big enough a name, neither was Angela Lansbury. When she was announced, a lot of people thought the producers were out of their minds. Well, theatre history proved them wrong. The fact that this is a revival, not an original musical, musical certainly Complicated the issue...it will never have a huge advance and further inflated prices without a huge star; but, since it hasn’t really had a serious revival since the original production, people aren’t overexposed to it, and great reviews by the lead might just do the trick. The longest running musical revivals have not benefitted from big stars.
Re the person who referred to Carousel, (a) the production sucked; and (2) I personally think that Carousel is viewed by too many people as a warhorse, because it has been around so long and performed everywhere. Mame, which if done right, is a funny, joyous show that doesn’t have as much Baggage IMO. But it does need a good production and a great lead...which the last production I saw — in DC - did not have.
Updated On: 6/29/19 at 12:15 AM