SHUCKED On Broadway - Reviews Thread — Page 7

RippedMan said: "It's not about what's fun or not, it's about what will people pay a premium ticket for?

For example: Look at any awards show. It always leans towards heavy dramatic roles and not fun Comedy. Same here. It might be a fun time, but is anyone paying for that? It's still a business. That's why I asked when was the last time a musical comedy was a giant hit?"

Based on the top grossing musicals of all time (via Wikipedia, link here), I think Wicked (which is a musical comedy, even with its serious elements) in 2nd place, The Book of Mormon in 5th place, Chicago (it's a satire, which is considered a form of comedy) in 6th place, and Mamma Mia! in 7th place, might beg to disagree.

I loved this show so much. I was grinning and guffawing. But I can fully appreciate that if you’re not one for lowbrow humor, it could be deadly. That some people will hate it is a given, but what an absolute joy for those of us who want something gleefully silly. Everyone in the cast is a star. The most fun I’ve had at the theater in a hot minute.

bwayphreak234 said: "I saw this recently and found the whole affair to just be rather... exhausting? The jokes are non-stop and are fired out at a rapid rate. I thought for every joke that was genuinely funny, there were at least five or six groaners/ dad jokes in between. By the end of the evening I had just stopped laughing all together.

The cast is great. I loved Alex Newell's big act one number. The set is serviceable - reminded me of a warped cartoonish version of the Hamilton set. I thought it was a little confining at times to have the whole show set in a barn, but that's just a minor quibble. Costumes are what you'd expect.

It's a fun night out, but I did feel that both acts dragged a bit. There are some clever songs and scenes, but overall, I can't necessarily say I'd recommend this to anyone.

"

I thought the same about the set! I totally made me think of Hamilton

TheatreMonkey said: "RippedMan said: "It's not about what's fun or not, it's about what will people pay a premium ticket for?

For example: Look at any awards show. It always leans towards heavy dramatic roles and not fun Comedy. Same here. It might be a fun time, but is anyone paying for that? It's still a business. That's why I asked when was the last time a musical comedy was a giant hit?"

Based on the top grossing musicals of all time (via Wikipedia, link here), I think Wicked (which is a musical comedy, even with its serious elements) in 2nd place, The Book of Mormon in 5th place, Chicago (it's a satire, which is considered a form of comedy) in 6th place, and Mamma Mia! in 7th place, might beg to disagree."

I think I’d disagree with your opinion on what makes something a musical comedy, and would def not put Wicked or Chicago or Mamma Mia in those categories. Book of Mormon sure. But to my point - and seemingly your point - we haven’t had a big hit musical comedy since Book of Mormon…

I was so excited for a new show that had what seemed to be rave reviews from the beginning.

It was fine

Went with my mom who's a Broadway lover like me and she fell asleep at least 4 times LOL. And that's absolutely out of her character. Nothing about it pulled either of us in.

The actors in the show are doing their best, but its such an ACTING! show because it's staged like a fable that it's just hard to get into it at all. Jokes are one liners that made me chuckle, but I anticipated every one and very few were actually clever.

The book overall is really weak, cliche, and corny (ha ha get it). It didn't have me connecting with any of the characters and the plot is so basic that the storyteller characters are unnecessary even though I think they were my favorite. Its also low stakes and the audience knows more than the characters for most of the show so that doesn't help the book at all. I clicked into the show after the yee-haw number with the barrel choreo about halfway through Act 2, and I really liked the drunk bar scene. I hoped the book would be really good because I loved Tootsie, I was let down.

Ensemble is so under utilized. LuLus song got a standing O, but the song itself wasn't that good. All the music was enjoyable and pleasing to my ears, but forgettable.

Set could be a lot more inventive, and the brown and corn colored color palette doesn't help that. I think the show could benefit from maybe a curtain or two or just house pieces that slide in from the sides to divide the front porch scenes and scenes that clearly take place outside from the scenes that take place indoors. I also think they should lean more into the fable aesthetic and maybe throw like a book binding on the edge of the stage outside of it or something. The top of it already has a weird slanting divider that seems like it could be obstructing the view of people in the last rows of the mezz.

I went back and read others reviews in this thread. I wouldn't call the show stupid but it's certainly silly. I see it getting a Tony nom in a handful of categories just because it is original, but I don't think the quality that its at now is lending itself to any awards. The only other new musical I've seen from this season is Some Like it Hot, and I loved that. You can't exactly compare the two because they're completely different styles, but SLIH blows Shucked out of the water in every category. I'm going to try to catch Kimberly Akimbo before the Tony's.


I want to see an entirely new musical succeed and I don't want to tear it to shreds, but it just was disappointing to go in with such high hopes and be met with a flat, basic show.

Updated On: 3/19/23 at 03:32 AM

Caught this last night from a lottery seat and am v glad I did not pay full price for this show. While I give it props for being a new original musical, I found the “jokes” to be so tedious after about an hour I could not help but just roll my eyes every time one of the basic dense and dumb one-liners was hurled. Back to back to back to back.

I totally agree that the score and book belong to two different shows. While Caroline Innerbichler had stunning vocal moments in some of the ballads, you did not care about her character at all. Horn’s book developed Maizy as such a flimsy and flat character you did not believe these songs could come out of her mouth. This disconnect between the book and score made the mostly enjoyable score completely unbelievable across the board.

I feel the men in this show overall were the weakest links. Grey is doing his best Damian “Mean Girls” impression up there mugging for the back row, which also gets tired after about 15 minutes.

Alex Newell (the main reason I was excited to see this show) was totally underutilized and their Act 1 number had fire vocals but the song overall was just fine. I would have loved to see this show where Ashley D. Kelley was Storyteller 1 and Alex was Storyteller 2. This would have been far more interesting.

While I realize humor is totally subjective I thought the sophomoric “blue collar” (as some of you have put it) jokes/puns were monotonous and dull. I did laugh a few times at the beginning, but towards the end of Act 1 I could not wait to get out of my seat. To leave the theatre. It was a packed house, and many of the people around me were letting out deep belly laughs, so I may be in the minority here with the jokes. But I can’t recommend this to anyone. And give Alex more material!

Updated On: 3/25/23 at 09:50 AM

We were at Saturday's matinee. There was one young woman screaming. I went with my husband and another couple. We all enjoyed it. Kimberly Akimbo is still tops but this was a solid second. It was highly entertaining. Not every show needs to be serious.

I also saw it last night with 11 other people that we bring to see a number of shows each March. Everyone thought it was hilarious and a fun night in the theater. They ranged in age from 13 to 65 and were from New York, Los Angeles and Alabama. I say that, only because it was a range of people with different backgrounds and exposure to Broadway. Each person said they would go back again if they had the opportunity.

I really wanted to like this more than I did.

It’s certainly funny and has some great lines, but I agree with those who said they were exhausted by the end (and not in a good, sated way) – at a point, the jokes start to feel like variations of earlier jokes and the humor felt tired by the end of the show.

The characters aren’t really fleshed out at all, which made it difficult to care about any of them. I would have been fine with the show offering only humor and entertainment, but, as mentioned above, once the humor ran out for me…there was nothing else to really keep me engaged.

The songs are fine, but not memorable and didn’t necessarily add anything to the show. I almost think this could have been better as a 90-minute straight play.

The two acts feels off-balance – the second act feels like they are suddenly trying to inject a little depth into the storyline, which I think would serve them well to do from the get go.

Sutton Ross said: "phantom1978 said: "Saw it last night and really enjoyed. No standout songs but I laughed so hard. Totally enjoyable evening of theater."

Same. People just want to have fun right now it seems. And the merch is the best on Broadway right now."

I never buy merch at any show but I bought a magnet and keychain at Shucked. I’ll be back in May and definitely grabbing a tote bag then.

Jordan Catalano said: "Something just occurred to me and someone who might know, please do correct me if I’m wrong. But this show was originally the Hee-Haw musical right? Because the endless parade of one liners fits in with that, if that style was a holdover from it being Hee-Haw."

Correct! Originally titled “The Hee-Haw Musical” and since then I believe has had a few other titles til they landed on “Shucked”.

Jordan Catalano said: "Something just occurred to me and someone who might know, please do correct me if I’m wrong. But this show was originally the Hee-Haw musical right? Because the endless parade of one liners fits in with that, if that style was a holdover from it being Hee-Haw."

Ironic that Hee-Haw is the title of the best song in the show (I think- there was no song list in the Playbill)

I was there tonight and apparently the house was sold out, so when I had to get my seat changed because of my stalky legs and husky butt, I was forced to endure standing room for Act I.

The show was fine. It wears its heart on it's sleeve, the jokes are hilarious, but for every real zinger, there were a handful where I audibly groaned. There were also some jokes that seemed thrown in for the sake of topicality as an easy one-liner (I'm specifically referring to the one about Plan B). This definitely has "regional production ready" written all over it.

I feel like Alex Newell and Andrew Durand did most of the heavy lifting for this show. Caroline Innenbacher seemed to be channeling Dawn from "Waitress" and definitely faded into the background at times. The twist at the end with the storytellers was cute.

It'll pick up a few nominations, but with all of the hand-wringing about how this show might knock Kimberly Akimbo off its pedestal shouldn't really worry that hard in my honest opinion.