HogansHero said: "No hate even possible in this context. What am I supposed to hate? Your avatar? And re bullying, you are the one who said you would rather torment me that educate yourself. For the record I wasn't bullied, but that's as close as it comes in this thread. Accusing someone of bullying for calling out willful ignorance is lame btw."
This exchange between you two is 100% irrelevant to anything.
Going back to the thread topic, I'm getting the sense that since Karen Olivo now has nothing but time, that her "advocacy" is going to continue, endlessly, no matter what changes are made. Rudin stepped back, but that changed absolutely nothing as far as I can tell.
A lot of people have pointed out that she was not particularly specific in her demands and it now feels like that was by design. If she had demands, and they were met, then her role as an advocate would be over. Without demands this can just be what she does, her new job, on an ongoing basis. It is to her benefit for Broadway to always be, in some sense, the bad guy.
I appreciate advocacy to a certain degree, but I like Broadway and I don't love that it seems like there is going to be an on-going, full-out assault on the institution, forever. Maybe it's because I'm not an insider, but at least in the last 10-20 years, it has always felt like one of the more inclusive mediums out there in terms of what ends up on stage. While the Oscars were being So White, Audra was winning her sixth Tony.
Anyway, I'm curious where this goes. Today she was promoting the March on Broadway, which I note does have "demands" and Demand #1 is "Put Scott Rudin on the AEA Do Not Work List". I previously compared this situation to McCarthyism so I appreciate that they already made the jump to putting people on blacklists.
Updated On: 4/19/21 at 01:29 PM